Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
fix(subscriber): only send *new* tasks/resources/etc over the event c…
…hannel (#238) ## Motivation Currently, there are some rather bad issues that occur when the event buffer is at capacity and events are dropped. Completely *losing* data due to buffer capacity is relatively okay: if we set a bound on how much memory the console can use, and we don't record new things that occur when we've reached that limit, this is correct and acceptable behavior. However, the current design can result in *incorrect* data when events are lost due to the buffer being at capacity. This is because we currently record things like starting to poll a task/resource, ending a poll, dropping a task/resource/async op, and waker operations, as individual events in the buffer. This means that we can have a situation where the creation of a task was recorded, because there was buffer capacity at the time, but then when the task ended, the buffer was full, so we never recorded its termination. That results in the tasks appearing to run forever and never terminate --- see issue #230. Similarly, if we record the beginning of a poll, but drop the end-of-poll event because we're at capacity, this means we will (incorrectly) record a poll that goes on forever, which is obviously incorrect. I think this may also be the cause of the false positives with the lost waker lint (#149), if we record a waker drop but missed a waker clone that previously occurred. The change in #212 fixed one category of issue that occurs due to event buffer capacity --- when a task, resource, or async op's _creation_ event is dropped due to buffer capacity, we skip any subsequent events related to that task/resource/op. However, this doesn't fix issues where the subsequent events are the ones that are dropped. ## Solution This branch proposes a solution to this whole category of event buffer capacity related issues. Unfortunately, this requires rewriting a *lot* of `console-subscriber`'s internals. In the new approach, we now _only_ send events over the channel when creating a new task, resource, or async op. Those events now contain an `Arc` holding the stats for that entity. Another clone of the `Arc` is stored in the `tracing_subscriber::Registry`'s [span extensions] for the span corresponding to that entity. When the `ConsoleLayer` records subsequent events for a particular entity, such as starting/ending a poll, it looks up the span by ID, and updates the stats type stored in its extensions. The aggregator stores its clone of the `Arc` in a map of entities, just like it does currently, but no longer handles actually updating the stats; just building wire format updates from any tracked entities whose data was updated by the layer. This should fix all issues where dropping something due to event buffer capacity results in incorrect data. Once we have successfully recorded the *creation* of a task, resource, or async op, any subsequent updates to its stats are *guaranteed* to be reliable. If the channel is at capacity and we fail to record a new resource/task/op, we never create a stats extension for it, and we won't record anything for it at all. Otherwise, it will always have correct data recorded. When possible, the stats in the `Arc`ed stats are updated atomically. In some cases, this isn't easily possible, and some fields of the stats types are stored in a mutex. In particualr, this is required for storing timestamps. I don't really love that, but these mutices should be contented very infrequently. Stats aren't marked as having unset updates until after the stats inside the mutices have been updated, so the aggregator will not try to lock the mutex if the layer is currently updating it; instead, it will simply be included in the next update once the layer is no longer touching it. Mutices here will only be contended when multiple threads are updating a task's stats at the same time, which should occur very rarely...and in most cases, they *still* won't have to contend a mutex, since access to most of the mutices are guarded by an atomic variable for e.g. determining which thread actually was the last to complete a concurrent poll. The biggest performance downside of the mutices is probably not actually contention, but the additional heap allocation required when using `std::sync::Mutex`. However, since we have conditional `parking_lot` support, parking_lot can be used to avoid requiring additional allocations. In the future, it's probably possible to make more of this atomic by converting timestamps into integers and storing them in atomic variables. I haven't done this yet because both the protobuf timestamps and `std::time` timestamps are larger than a single 64-bit number and it might take a little extra work to ensure we can nicely fit them in an `AtomicUsize`...but we can probably do that later. [span extensions]: https://docs.rs/tracing-subscriber/latest/tracing_subscriber/registry/struct.SpanRef.html#method.extensions Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <eliza@buoyant.io>
- Loading branch information