Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Allow registration of custom handles on Windows
This commit intends to extend the functionality of mio on Windows to support custom handles being registered with the internal IOCP object. This in turn should unlock the ability to work with named pipes, filesystem changes, or any other IOCP-enabled object on Windows. Named pipes are in particular quite important as they're often a foundational IPC mechanism on Windows. This support is provided by exporting two new types in a `windows` module. A `Binding` serves as the ability to register with the actual IOCP port in an `Evented` implementation. Internally the `Binding` keeps track of what it was last associated with to implement IOCP semantics. This may one day be possible to make a zero-sized-type. The second type, `Overlapped`, is exported as a contract that all overlapped I/O operations must be executed with this particular type. This ensures that after an event is received from an IOCP object we know what to do with it. Essentially this is just a `OVERLAPPED` with a function pointer after it. Along the way this exposes the `winapi` crate as a public dependency of `mio`. The `OVERLAPPED_ENTRY` and `OVERLAPPED` types in `winapi` are exposed through the `Overlapped` type that mio itself exports. I've implemented [bindings to named pipes][bindings] and I've also got a proof-of-concept [process management library][tokio-process] using these bindings. So far it seems that this support in mio is sufficient for building up these applications, and it all appears to be working so far. I personally see this as a much bigger committment on the mio side of things than the Unix implementation. The `EventedFd` type on Unix is quite small and minimal, but the `Overlapped` and `binding` types on Windows are just pieces of a larger puzzle when dealing with overlapped operations. Questions about ownership of I/O objects arise along with the method of handling completion status notifications. For now this is essentially binding mio to stick to at least the same strategy for handling IOCP for the 0.6 series. A major version bump of mio could perhaps change these semantics, but it may be difficult to do so. It seems, though, that the Windows semantics are unlikely to change much in the near future. The overhead seems to have essentially reached its limit ("bolting readiness on completion") and otherwise the ownership management seems negligible. Closes #252 Closes #320
- Loading branch information