Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose Semaphore::MAX_PERMITS and document it #5144
Expose Semaphore::MAX_PERMITS and document it #5144
Changes from all commits
57cc65e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be nice to keep the note that the value is
usize::MAX >> 3
somewhere in the docs, though probably not here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does't specific number visible in the docs (it looks like this:
pub const MAX_PERMITS: usize = 2_305_843_009_213_693_951usize
) clarify this?Or do you mean the documentation should state that this number is fixed and is not expected to change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I mean that the docs should mention that
2_305_843_009_213_693_951usize
is equal tousize::MAX >> 3
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added sentence about that.
Also searched for other
usize::MAX >> 3
in the docs and replaced with a link toMAX_PERMITS
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another thing it would make sense to point out is that
2_305_843_009_213_693_951usize
is only the correct number on 64-bit platforms.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
usize::MAX >> 3
implies different value on different platforms.