Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
util: add
JoinMap::keys
#6046util: add
JoinMap::keys
#6046Changes from 1 commit
1a5bc08
bf31e91
9c64a7d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's definitely much simpler to return an
impl Iterator
here. However, I will note that thehash_map::Keys
iterator that this wraps also implements some other traits: in addition to being anIterator
, it also implementsClone
,ExactSizeIterator
, andFusedIterator
. It might be better if we returned an iterator that also implements those traits.In particular,
ExactSizeIterator
is used by the standard library to implement optimizations whencollect()
ing an iterator into particular collections, likeVec
s andHashMap
s, since the size of the iterator can be reserved up front bywith_capacity
, instead of allocating multiple times while collecting.Therefore, we may want to change this to return a named
Keys
iterator, like this:Or, alternatively, I think we could write
but I think the named type might be a nicer API surface for users?