Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tracing: make
Entered
!Send
#1001tracing: make
Entered
!Send
#1001Changes from 1 commit
7eef5d3
89ce4fd
81e9e5b
bdb80e7
674aa38
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit weird, but -1 unsafe, because you don't need to
unsafe impl Sync
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh that's clever! thanks!
unfortunately we can't do exactly what you've suggested, because this needs to compile with the
std
feature disabled, but I can do something similar.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't actually unsafe? We are not dereferencing this type, thus doesn't require unsafe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LucioFranco the unsafe was necessary for manually implementing
Sync
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...and, it turns out this approach doesn't actually work in this specific case. Because
tracing
has conditional support forno_std
, we can't use thestd::sync
version ofMutexGuard
. I thought we could use theMutexGuard
from the spinlock implementation that's used as a fallback on no-std platforms, but I'd forgotten that this is defined intracing-core
, nottracing
, and isn't publicly visible. I'll probably go back to the previous approach of just accepting the additionalunsafe
keyword necessary to manually implSync
.