Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Unpin requirement from Transport #399

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 2, 2020
Merged

Conversation

e00E
Copy link
Contributor

@e00E e00E commented Oct 30, 2020

This is based on the other PR for eth_subscribe so it includes that commit too. After making use of pin-project there I realized I could do this directly for CallFuture and thus make Transport no longer require Unpin even without removing all of the uses of CallFuture. There are still uses of Unpin in a couple of tests, http.rs and ws.rs . It looks like those are benign because everything still compiles but I am a little bit wary that this might have some unexpected consequence.

Here I was unable to convert SubscriptionStream to `impl Stream` because
it has additional methods and runs code on drop.
To get rid of the Unpin requirement anyway we use pin_project
(https://docs.rs/pin-project/1.0.1/pin_project/).
@@ -20,10 +24,10 @@ impl<A, B, AOut, BOut> Transport for Either<A, B>
where
A: Transport<Out = AOut>,
B: Transport<Out = BOut>,
AOut: futures::Future<Output = error::Result<rpc::Value>> + Unpin + 'static,
BOut: futures::Future<Output = error::Result<rpc::Value>> + Unpin + 'static,
AOut: futures::Future<Output = error::Result<rpc::Value>> + 'static + Send,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think previously EitherTransport did not require Send but now it does because of BoxFuture. I wasn't able to get the types to work out otherwise. Technically one could duplicate this code and use LocalBoxFuture to get rid of the Send requirement.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO acceptable trade-off for async code for now.

@@ -20,10 +24,10 @@ impl<A, B, AOut, BOut> Transport for Either<A, B>
where
A: Transport<Out = AOut>,
B: Transport<Out = BOut>,
AOut: futures::Future<Output = error::Result<rpc::Value>> + Unpin + 'static,
BOut: futures::Future<Output = error::Result<rpc::Value>> + Unpin + 'static,
AOut: futures::Future<Output = error::Result<rpc::Value>> + 'static + Send,
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO acceptable trade-off for async code for now.

@tomusdrw tomusdrw merged commit c8a1aad into tomusdrw:master Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants