Regex Lookbehind and the <=< ligature

[j-f1]

I encountered this issue here:

(?<=<foo>)

This would look better rendered as

(?<=​<foo>)

since the <= and < are separate. It looks like matching (?<= separately would do the trick here.

[tonsky]

Thanks!

[ghost]

I feel that the lookbehind sequence "?<=" probably shouldn't use a ligature at all (or it should have its own ligature, but that's a bigger ask). In regex, the "<=" doesn't mean the same thing as "≤".

[long-lazuli]

Matching (?<= would do the trick, but I would rather see a left arrow than a lessOrEqual sign aside the ? ...