Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fragments support #167

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Fragments support #167

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

DjebbZ
Copy link
Contributor

@DjebbZ DjebbZ commented Jun 1, 2018

This time for real. My simple implementation seems to work well (at least it passes the test).

This needs more tests maybe, examples and Readme update at least.

@DjebbZ DjebbZ mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2018
4 tasks
@solidfox
Copy link

solidfox commented Jun 4, 2018

Really looking forward to this. Wish I had the time to help you out with more tests. Maybe this weekend.

@DjebbZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

DjebbZ commented Jun 4, 2018

I think we're close to fully support them. Need more manual/automated testing I think. Especially the case with several top fragments level. Maybe others.

@PEZ
Copy link

PEZ commented Mar 23, 2019

What's the status for this?

@DjebbZ
Copy link
Contributor Author

DjebbZ commented Mar 23, 2019 via email

@roman01la
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello 👋 New maintainer here.

We'll most likely pull in Sablono into the repo some time in the future (see #198), so this will be addressed later for both JS and JVM targets. The plan is to have :<> Hiccup tag instead.

@roman01la roman01la added the hiccup Issues related to Hiccup syntax label Apr 8, 2020
@roman01la
Copy link
Collaborator

fragment component has landed on master, we'll stick with a macro for now

@roman01la roman01la closed this Apr 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hiccup Issues related to Hiccup syntax
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants