Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Java >= 9 compatibility #22

Closed
tobiasstamann opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Java >= 9 compatibility #22

tobiasstamann opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@tobiasstamann
Copy link
Contributor

tobiasstamann commented Jul 18, 2018 •
edited
Loading

The APTK internally uses the google compile test library.

But we are in a kind of dilemma. Only versions <= 0.9 are compatible with Java versions 6 and 7.
But these versions are using the tools.jar and are therefore incompatible with Java >= 9.

We need to replace the library by some custom code. We can use the existing Fluent api and just replace the implementation.
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22] Enhanced Java >= 9 compatibility.
8f4619c 
Removed google.compiletesting dependency to achieve this.
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22] Active builds on Travis with JDKs >= 9
47cc151
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22]Replaced cobertura plugin by jacoco plugin
a3dcf7b
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22] Removed Travis Build support for java 11
8d1d60d
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22] Fixed NPE during test with created resource during c…
33c5106 
…ompilation
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22] Removed Travis Build support for java 10 and added 1…
f26a576 
…1 again
tobiasstamann added a commit to tobiasstamann/annotation-processor-toolkit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[toolisticon#22,toolisticon#11,toolisticon#18] Achieve java >=9 compa…
bfbed8c 
…tibility

Replace google compile-testing framework by toolisticon compile-testing framework.
Replaced maven parent.
tobiasstamann added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2018
@tobiasstamann
[#22,#11,#18] java >=9 compatibility, replaced maven pom, test cover…
076078a 
…age (#23)

* Updated travis config for development on fork

* Updated Readme for Fork

Linked  badges for travis and codecov for fork

* [#22] Enhanced Java >= 9 compatibility.

Removed google.compiletesting dependency to achieve this.

* [#22] Active builds on Travis with JDKs >= 9

* [#22]Replaced cobertura plugin by jacoco plugin

* [#22] Removed Travis Build support for java 11

* [#22] Fixed NPE during test with created resource during compilation

* [#22] Removed Travis Build support for java 10 and added 11 again

* Increase unit test coverage

* Increase unit test coverage

* Increase unit test coverage
Introduced SPI for Asserts - allows support of junit5 and other test frameworks

* Minor refactorings and increase test coverage

* Fix tests

* Fix build for jdk >=9

* Increase unit test coverage

* [#22,#11,#18] Achieve java >=9 compatibility

Replace google compile-testing framework by toolisticon compile-testing framework.
Replaced maven parent.
@tobiasstamann
Copy link
Contributor Author

APT-TK framework can now be used with java >=9

Adding jigsaw module descriptor is still pending

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tobiasstamann