Copilot workflow changes #254
Conversation
| initiatorUserId: req.authUser.userId, | ||
| }, logger); | ||
|
|
||
| if (role === PROJECT_MEMBER_ROLE.COPILOT && status === INVITE_STATUS.ACCEPTED) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gondzo should we send only copilot events only in this case and bypass the event on line https://github.com/topcoder-platform/tc-project-service/pull/254/files#diff-42ae3999a1a28855656e72e3e1e1ea71R727 ? otherwise I think it would result in duplicate emails being sent from tc-notifications ?
| initiatorUserId: req.authUser.userId, | ||
| }, logger); | ||
|
|
||
| if (role === PROJECT_MEMBER_ROLE.COPILOT) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@gondzo same as the issue mentioned in case of updated event below, should we bypass create event in case of requested event event thrown ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, we should skip raising the created event in this case.
src/constants.js
Outdated
| PROJECT_MEMBER_INVITE_CREATED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.invite.created', | ||
| PROJECT_MEMBER_INVITE_REQUESTED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.invite.requested', | ||
| PROJECT_MEMBER_INVITE_UPDATED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.invite.updated', | ||
| PROJECT_MEMBER_COPILOT_ADDED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.copilot.added', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Renaming of events needed as suggested in other PR topcoder-platform/tc-notifications#89
src/constants.js
Outdated
| PROJECT_MEMBER_INVITE_REQUESTED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.invite.requested', | ||
| PROJECT_MEMBER_INVITE_UPDATED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.invite.updated', | ||
| PROJECT_MEMBER_COPILOT_ADDED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.copilot.added', | ||
| PROJECT_MEMBER_COPILOT_REFUSED: 'notifications.connect.project.member.copilot.refused', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Renaming of events needed as suggested in other PR topcoder-platform/tc-notifications#89
| ); | ||
| // send email invite (async) | ||
| if (v.email && !v.userId) { | ||
| if (v.email && !v.userId && v.role !== PROJECT_MEMBER_ROLE.COPILOT) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we better check the status (v.status === 'pending') of the invite itself rather than depending of the role? We might have some future requirements where we might need to add more roles where we need workflow like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no, we don't send the email for copilots only - invite status is still the same regardless of role
3 participants
Changes as part of appirio-tech/connect-app#2837