Create Kernel Build #304

ghost · 2016-07-12T14:43:02Z

No description provided.

lockdep insists that if we give a lock a subclass, it must be used. Failure to do so triggers a self-consistency check when reading lockdep_stats: [ 49.902002] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused) [ 49.902009] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 383 at kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:249 lockdep_stats_show+0x984/0xa10 [ 49.902026] Modules linked in: nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper intel_cstate intel_uncore intel_rapl_perf intel_gtt efivars prime_numbers ahci libahci i2c_i801 video button efivarfs [last unloaded: drm_kms_helper] [ 49.902059] CPU: 3 PID: 383 Comm: cat Tainted: G U 4.20.0-rc2+ torvalds#304 [ 49.902068] Hardware name: Intel Corporation NUC7i5BNK/NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0052.2017.0918.1346 09/18/2017 [ 49.902079] RIP: 0010:lockdep_stats_show+0x984/0xa10 [ 49.902086] Code: 00 85 c0 0f 84 aa f8 ff ff 8b 05 77 37 e2 00 85 c0 0f 85 9c f8 ff ff 48 c7 c6 e0 57 bc 81 48 c7 c7 28 30 bb 81 e8 6b 77 fa ff <0f> 0b e9 82 f8 ff ff 48 c7 44 24 50 00 00 00 00 45 31 e4 31 db 31 [ 49.902103] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000247d58 EFLAGS: 00010292 [ 49.902110] RAX: 0000000000000044 RBX: 00000000000002f0 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 49.902118] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff810b3464 [ 49.902126] RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 49.902133] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000007ead [ 49.902141] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88884c021000 R15: 0000000000000097 [ 49.902150] FS: 00007fb347e66540(0000) GS:ffff88885e600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 49.902159] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 49.902165] CR2: 00007fb347aeb000 CR3: 00000008544bd005 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181115203851.25739-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: torvalds#298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

At the time being, PPC32 has Classical BPF support. The test_bpf module exhibits some failure: test_bpf: torvalds#298 LD_IND byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#299 LD_IND halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#301 LD_IND halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#303 LD_ABS byte frag jited:1 ret 202 != 66 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#304 LD_ABS halfword frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 17220 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: torvalds#306 LD_ABS halfword mixed head/frag jited:1 ret 51958 != 1305 FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: Summary: 371 PASSED, 7 FAILED, [119/366 JIT'ed] Fixing this is not worth the effort. Instead, remove support for classical BPF and prepare for adding Extended BPF support instead. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fbc3e4fcc9c8f6131d6c705212530b2aa50149ee.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu

When testing send_signal and stacktrace_build_id_nmi using the riscv sbi pmu driver without the sscofpmf extension or the riscv legacy pmu driver, then failures as follows are encountered: test_send_signal_common:FAIL:perf_event_open unexpected perf_event_open: actual -1 < expected 0 torvalds#272/3 send_signal/send_signal_nmi:FAIL test_stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL:perf_event_open err -1 errno 95 torvalds#304 stacktrace_build_id_nmi:FAIL The reason is that the above pmu driver or hardware does not support sampling events, that is, PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is set to pmu capabilities, and then perf_event_open returns EOPNOTSUPP. Since PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT is not only set in the riscv-related pmu driver, it is better to skip testing when this capability is set. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240402073029.1299085-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com

Create Kernel Build

e43d617

ghost closed this Jul 12, 2016

This pull request was closed.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Create Kernel Build #304

Create Kernel Build #304

ghost commented Jul 12, 2016

Create Kernel Build #304

Create Kernel Build #304

Conversation

ghost commented Jul 12, 2016