Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

USB: serial: cp210x: add new device EZP2010 #519

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

USB: serial: cp210x: add new device EZP2010 #519

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

klukonin
Copy link

EZP2010 is a very popular Chinese USB SPI Programmer. Manufacturer provides only windows drivers, but this device is based on Silicon Labs CP210x chip, so it is not so hard to add it to the driver id table.

EZP2010 is a very popular Chinese USB SPI Programmer. Manufacturer provides only windows drivers, but this device is based on Silicon Labs CP210x chip, so it is not so hard to add it to the driver id table.
@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @klukonin!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

@ajdlinux
Copy link
Contributor

Let me know if you need help upstreaming this, the instructions above should give you most of what you need to know.

apxii pushed a commit to apxii/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2018
[ Upstream commit 332270f ]

llvm 4.0 and above generates the code like below:
....
440: (b7) r1 = 15
441: (05) goto pc+73
515: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -152)
516: (bf) r7 = r10
517: (07) r7 += -112
518: (bf) r2 = r7
519: (0f) r2 += r1
520: (71) r1 = *(u8 *)(r8 +0)
521: (73) *(u8 *)(r2 +45) = r1
....
and the verifier complains "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'" for insn torvalds#521.
This is because verifier marks register r2 as unknown value after torvalds#519
where r2 is a stack pointer and r1 holds a constant value.

Teach verifier to recognize "stack_ptr + imm" and
"stack_ptr + reg with const val" as valid stack_ptr with new offset.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
@EEpimetheus
Copy link

I'm brand new to linux trying to use my EZP2010 for the first time since moving from windows. I'm on Ubuntu 18, can somebody tell how to do this or point me in the right direction? Thank you.

@klukonin
Copy link
Author

@EEpimetheus Sorry, it was a kind of initial commit. But I didn't make a real support of this pprogrammer (I have one in my lab).
Last time my attempt was unsuccessful and I think the only way to move forward is to do some reverse engineering.
I't a little bit strange that such programmer "emulates" third-party ttyUSB interface.
May be we should move to another place and continue our work =)

@EEpimetheus
Copy link

weird alright thanks. Alright, at least programmers are cheap.

ojeda pushed a commit to ojeda/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2021
AkihiroSuda pushed a commit to AkihiroSuda/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2023
IonAgorria pushed a commit to IonAgorria/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023
The nfs_commit_file for NFSv4.2's COPY operation goes through
the commit path for normal WRITE, but without increase nrequests,
so, the nrequests decreased in nfs_commit_release_pages is fault.
After that, the nrequests will be wrong.

[ 5670.299881] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5670.300295] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 27656 at fs/nfs/inode.c:127 nfs_clear_inode+0x66/0x90 [nfs]
[ 5670.300558] Modules linked in: nfsv4(E) nfs(E) fscache(E) tun bridge stp llc fuse ip_set nfnetlink vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event ppdev f2fs coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel snd_ens1371 intel_rapl_perf gameport snd_ac97_codec vmw_balloon ac97_bus snd_seq snd_pcm joydev snd_rawmidi snd_timer snd_seq_device snd soundcore nfit parport_pc parport acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm_tis_core tpm i2c_piix4 vmw_vmci shpchp nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm e1000 crc32c_intel mptspi scsi_transport_spi serio_raw mptscsih mptbase ata_generic pata_acpi fjes [last unloaded: fscache]
[ 5670.302925] CPU: 0 PID: 27656 Comm: umount.nfs4 Tainted: G        W   E   4.11.0-rc1+ torvalds#519
[ 5670.303292] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015
[ 5670.304094] Call Trace:
[ 5670.304510]  dump_stack+0x63/0x86
[ 5670.304917]  __warn+0xcb/0xf0
[ 5670.305276]  warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[ 5670.305661]  nfs_clear_inode+0x66/0x90 [nfs]
[ 5670.306093]  nfs4_evict_inode+0x61/0x70 [nfsv4]
[ 5670.306480]  evict+0xbb/0x1c0
[ 5670.306888]  dispose_list+0x4d/0x70
[ 5670.307233]  evict_inodes+0x178/0x1a0
[ 5670.307579]  generic_shutdown_super+0x44/0xf0
[ 5670.307985]  nfs_kill_super+0x21/0x40 [nfs]
[ 5670.308325]  deactivate_locked_super+0x43/0x70
[ 5670.308698]  deactivate_super+0x5a/0x60
[ 5670.309036]  cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90
[ 5670.309407]  __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
[ 5670.309837]  task_work_run+0x80/0xa0
[ 5670.310162]  exit_to_usermode_loop+0x89/0x90
[ 5670.310497]  syscall_return_slowpath+0xaa/0xb0
[ 5670.310875]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xa7/0xa9
[ 5670.311197] RIP: 0033:0x7f1bb3617fe7
[ 5670.311545] RSP: 002b:00007ffecbabb828 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 5670.311906] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000001dca1f0 RCX: 00007f1bb3617fe7
[ 5670.312239] RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000001dc83c0
[ 5670.312653] RBP: 0000000001dc83c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 5670.312998] R10: 0000000000000755 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffecbabc66a
[ 5670.313335] R13: 0000000001dc83a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 5670.313758] ---[ end trace bf4bfe7764e4eb40 ]---

Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 67911c8 ("NFS: Add nfs_commit_file()")
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.7+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants