-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A question about your kernel 4.12.1 #528
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @mickpf! Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel! Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch. Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process. Here's what to do:
How do I format my contribution?The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations. Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea. You can create patches with Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary. Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with. Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel. Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this. Who do I send my contribution to?The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes. If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the
Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches. It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.) How do I send my contribution?Use For more information about using How do I get help if I'm stuck?Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed. Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine. If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:
If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers! I sent my patch - now what?You wait. You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at. Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:
Further information
Happy hacking! This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot. |
Well, any x86 OS which supports EFI will work on the UP Board or UP Squared, but only the Ubilinux image or custom Ubuntu kernels provided by the UP Wiki will be able to support specialized peripherals made for UP Boards, like the WiFi attachment, allow interfacing with GPIO, etc... So, although you can use a generic Linux kernel on an UP Board or UP Squared, you won't be able to use all of the board's features. Note that the 5v, 3.3v, and ground pins will still work, no matter what OS your board is running. |
After looking at your commits, although the kernel will probably work with most, if not all, UP Board attachments, they aren't going to merge it with the main kernel. The changes are likely to also work with the UP Squared, but due to differences in hardware, it is likely that not all functionality will work properly. I don't have an UP Squared (I have the normal UP Board), so I can't test this myself, but you could try it out and see. |
When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, lkl#524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, lkl#528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, lkl#32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, lkl#524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, lkl#528] 1b0: mov r6, lkl#104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, lkl#32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, lkl#44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, torvalds#596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
…ntel-audio-20190111 Merge/backport v4.20 intel audio 20190111
Fix the following checkpatch errors: ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW) torvalds#280: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c:280: + i2c_clr_bit(dev->virtbase + I2C_CR , I2C_CR_PE); ^ ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW) torvalds#528: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c:528: + i2c_set_bit(dev->virtbase + I2C_CR , I2C_CR_PE); ^ No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Zihao Tang <tangzihao1@hisilicon.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Fix the following checkpatch errors: ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW) torvalds#280: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c:280: + i2c_clr_bit(dev->virtbase + I2C_CR , I2C_CR_PE); ^ ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW) torvalds#528: FILE: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c:528: + i2c_set_bit(dev->virtbase + I2C_CR , I2C_CR_PE); ^ No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiantao6@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Zihao Tang <tangzihao1@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
rust: upgrade to Edition 2021
After blamed commit, nexthop_fib6_nh_bh() and nexthop_fib6_nh() are the same. Delete nexthop_fib6_nh_bh(), and convert /proc/net/ipv6_route to standard rcu to avoid this splat: [ 5723.180080] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 5723.180083] ----------------------------- [ 5723.180084] include/net/nexthop.h:516 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 5723.180086] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5723.180087] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 5723.180089] 2 locks held by cat/55856: [ 5723.180091] #0: ffff9440a582afa8 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:188) [ 5723.180100] #1: ffffffffaac07040 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire (include/linux/rcupdate.h:326) [ 5723.180109] stack backtrace: [ 5723.180111] CPU: 14 PID: 55856 Comm: cat Tainted: G S I 6.3.0-dbx-DEV torvalds#528 [ 5723.180115] Call Trace: [ 5723.180117] <TASK> [ 5723.180119] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107) [ 5723.180124] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114) [ 5723.180126] lockdep_rcu_suspicious (include/linux/context_tracking.h:122) [ 5723.180132] ipv6_route_seq_show (include/net/nexthop.h:?) [ 5723.180135] ? ipv6_route_seq_next (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2605) [ 5723.180140] seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:272) [ 5723.180145] seq_read (fs/seq_file.c:163) [ 5723.180151] proc_reg_read (fs/proc/inode.c:316 fs/proc/inode.c:328) [ 5723.180155] vfs_read (fs/read_write.c:468) [ 5723.180160] ? up_read (kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1617) [ 5723.180164] ksys_read (fs/read_write.c:613) [ 5723.180168] __x64_sys_read (fs/read_write.c:621) [ 5723.180170] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?) [ 5723.180174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) [ 5723.180177] RIP: 0033:0x7fa455677d2a Fixes: 09eed11 ("neighbour: switch to standard rcu, instead of rcu_bh") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
After blamed commit, nexthop_fib6_nh_bh() and nexthop_fib6_nh() are the same. Delete nexthop_fib6_nh_bh(), and convert /proc/net/ipv6_route to standard rcu to avoid this splat: [ 5723.180080] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 5723.180083] ----------------------------- [ 5723.180084] include/net/nexthop.h:516 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 5723.180086] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5723.180087] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 5723.180089] 2 locks held by cat/55856: [ 5723.180091] #0: ffff9440a582afa8 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:188) [ 5723.180100] #1: ffffffffaac07040 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire (include/linux/rcupdate.h:326) [ 5723.180109] stack backtrace: [ 5723.180111] CPU: 14 PID: 55856 Comm: cat Tainted: G S I 6.3.0-dbx-DEV torvalds#528 [ 5723.180115] Call Trace: [ 5723.180117] <TASK> [ 5723.180119] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107) [ 5723.180124] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114) [ 5723.180126] lockdep_rcu_suspicious (include/linux/context_tracking.h:122) [ 5723.180132] ipv6_route_seq_show (include/net/nexthop.h:?) [ 5723.180135] ? ipv6_route_seq_next (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2605) [ 5723.180140] seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:272) [ 5723.180145] seq_read (fs/seq_file.c:163) [ 5723.180151] proc_reg_read (fs/proc/inode.c:316 fs/proc/inode.c:328) [ 5723.180155] vfs_read (fs/read_write.c:468) [ 5723.180160] ? up_read (kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1617) [ 5723.180164] ksys_read (fs/read_write.c:613) [ 5723.180168] __x64_sys_read (fs/read_write.c:621) [ 5723.180170] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?) [ 5723.180174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) [ 5723.180177] RIP: 0033:0x7fa455677d2a Fixes: 09eed11 ("neighbour: switch to standard rcu, instead of rcu_bh") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510154646.370659-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
commit ef1148d upstream. After blamed commit, nexthop_fib6_nh_bh() and nexthop_fib6_nh() are the same. Delete nexthop_fib6_nh_bh(), and convert /proc/net/ipv6_route to standard rcu to avoid this splat: [ 5723.180080] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 5723.180083] ----------------------------- [ 5723.180084] include/net/nexthop.h:516 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 5723.180086] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5723.180087] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 5723.180089] 2 locks held by cat/55856: [ 5723.180091] #0: ffff9440a582afa8 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:188) [ 5723.180100] #1: ffffffffaac07040 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire (include/linux/rcupdate.h:326) [ 5723.180109] stack backtrace: [ 5723.180111] CPU: 14 PID: 55856 Comm: cat Tainted: G S I 6.3.0-dbx-DEV torvalds#528 [ 5723.180115] Call Trace: [ 5723.180117] <TASK> [ 5723.180119] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107) [ 5723.180124] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114) [ 5723.180126] lockdep_rcu_suspicious (include/linux/context_tracking.h:122) [ 5723.180132] ipv6_route_seq_show (include/net/nexthop.h:?) [ 5723.180135] ? ipv6_route_seq_next (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2605) [ 5723.180140] seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:272) [ 5723.180145] seq_read (fs/seq_file.c:163) [ 5723.180151] proc_reg_read (fs/proc/inode.c:316 fs/proc/inode.c:328) [ 5723.180155] vfs_read (fs/read_write.c:468) [ 5723.180160] ? up_read (kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1617) [ 5723.180164] ksys_read (fs/read_write.c:613) [ 5723.180168] __x64_sys_read (fs/read_write.c:621) [ 5723.180170] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?) [ 5723.180174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) [ 5723.180177] RIP: 0033:0x7fa455677d2a Fixes: 09eed11 ("neighbour: switch to standard rcu, instead of rcu_bh") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510154646.370659-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit ef1148d upstream. After blamed commit, nexthop_fib6_nh_bh() and nexthop_fib6_nh() are the same. Delete nexthop_fib6_nh_bh(), and convert /proc/net/ipv6_route to standard rcu to avoid this splat: [ 5723.180080] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 5723.180083] ----------------------------- [ 5723.180084] include/net/nexthop.h:516 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 5723.180086] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5723.180087] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 5723.180089] 2 locks held by cat/55856: [ 5723.180091] #0: ffff9440a582afa8 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:188) [ 5723.180100] #1: ffffffffaac07040 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire (include/linux/rcupdate.h:326) [ 5723.180109] stack backtrace: [ 5723.180111] CPU: 14 PID: 55856 Comm: cat Tainted: G S I 6.3.0-dbx-DEV torvalds#528 [ 5723.180115] Call Trace: [ 5723.180117] <TASK> [ 5723.180119] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107) [ 5723.180124] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114) [ 5723.180126] lockdep_rcu_suspicious (include/linux/context_tracking.h:122) [ 5723.180132] ipv6_route_seq_show (include/net/nexthop.h:?) [ 5723.180135] ? ipv6_route_seq_next (net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2605) [ 5723.180140] seq_read_iter (fs/seq_file.c:272) [ 5723.180145] seq_read (fs/seq_file.c:163) [ 5723.180151] proc_reg_read (fs/proc/inode.c:316 fs/proc/inode.c:328) [ 5723.180155] vfs_read (fs/read_write.c:468) [ 5723.180160] ? up_read (kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1617) [ 5723.180164] ksys_read (fs/read_write.c:613) [ 5723.180168] __x64_sys_read (fs/read_write.c:621) [ 5723.180170] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:?) [ 5723.180174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) [ 5723.180177] RIP: 0033:0x7fa455677d2a Fixes: 09eed11 ("neighbour: switch to standard rcu, instead of rcu_bh") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230510154646.370659-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Hello,
is your kernel compatible/usable with UP Squared also?
Thanks in advance,
Michael