Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replaced readme with the text MOTHER Tatyana Kurtukova #860

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

gmehdiev
Copy link

@gmehdiev gmehdiev commented May 8, 2024

Added braille font, I think it is extremely inappropriate that Linux does not care about people with low vision

m-weigand pushed a commit to m-weigand/linux that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
commit ea73179 upstream.

Michael reported that we are seeing an ftrace bug on bootup when KASAN
is enabled and we are using -fpatchable-function-entry:

  ftrace: allocating 47780 entries in 18 pages
  ftrace-powerpc: 0xc0000000020b3d5c: No module provided for non-kernel address
  ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------
  ftrace faulted on modifying
  [<c0000000020b3d5c>] 0xc0000000020b3d5c
  Initializing ftrace call sites
  ftrace record flags: 0
   (0)
   expected tramp: c00000000008cef4
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2180 ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef torvalds#860
  Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER9 (raw) 0x4e1202 0xf000005 of:SLOF,HEAD hv:linux,kvm pSeries
  NIP:  c0000000003aa81c LR: c0000000003aa818 CTR: 0000000000000000
  REGS: c0000000033cfab0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef)
  MSR:  8000000002021033 <SF,VEC,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28028240  XER: 00000000
  CFAR: c0000000002781a8 IRQMASK: 3
  ...
  NIP [c0000000003aa81c] ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424
  LR [c0000000003aa818] ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424
  Call Trace:
   ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424 (unreliable)
   ftrace_process_locs+0x5f4/0x8a0
   ftrace_init+0xc0/0x1d0
   start_kernel+0x1d8/0x484

With CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY=y and
CONFIG_KASAN=y, compiler emits nops in functions that it generates for
registering and unregistering global variables (unlike with -pg and
-mprofile-kernel where calls to _mcount() are not generated in those
functions). Those functions then end up in INIT_TEXT and EXIT_TEXT
respectively. We don't expect to see any profiled functions in
EXIT_TEXT, so ftrace_init_nop() assumes that all addresses that aren't
in the core kernel text belongs to a module. Since these functions do
not match that criteria, we see the above bug.

Address this by having ftrace ignore all locations in the text exit
sections of vmlinux.

Fixes: 0f71dcf ("powerpc/ftrace: Add support for -fpatchable-function-entry")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240213175410.1091313-1-naveen@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
@Cody212
Copy link

Cody212 commented May 12, 2024

Bruh😭

@p-shcherbatykh
Copy link

crazy

@OTonGitHub
Copy link

Excuse my ignorance but, how will they actually read it though? I don't think blind people print repos into braille paper.

@ASHWIN990
Copy link

🤣

@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @gmehdiev!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Where do I send my contribution?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

roy-hopkins pushed a commit to roy-hopkins/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2024
Michael reported that we are seeing an ftrace bug on bootup when KASAN
is enabled and we are using -fpatchable-function-entry:

  ftrace: allocating 47780 entries in 18 pages
  ftrace-powerpc: 0xc0000000020b3d5c: No module provided for non-kernel address
  ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------
  ftrace faulted on modifying
  [<c0000000020b3d5c>] 0xc0000000020b3d5c
  Initializing ftrace call sites
  ftrace record flags: 0
   (0)
   expected tramp: c00000000008cef4
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2180 ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef torvalds#860
  Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER9 (raw) 0x4e1202 0xf000005 of:SLOF,HEAD hv:linux,kvm pSeries
  NIP:  c0000000003aa81c LR: c0000000003aa818 CTR: 0000000000000000
  REGS: c0000000033cfab0 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef)
  MSR:  8000000002021033 <SF,VEC,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 28028240  XER: 00000000
  CFAR: c0000000002781a8 IRQMASK: 3
  ...
  NIP [c0000000003aa81c] ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424
  LR [c0000000003aa818] ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424
  Call Trace:
   ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424 (unreliable)
   ftrace_process_locs+0x5f4/0x8a0
   ftrace_init+0xc0/0x1d0
   start_kernel+0x1d8/0x484

With CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY=y and
CONFIG_KASAN=y, compiler emits nops in functions that it generates for
registering and unregistering global variables (unlike with -pg and
-mprofile-kernel where calls to _mcount() are not generated in those
functions). Those functions then end up in INIT_TEXT and EXIT_TEXT
respectively. We don't expect to see any profiled functions in
EXIT_TEXT, so ftrace_init_nop() assumes that all addresses that aren't
in the core kernel text belongs to a module. Since these functions do
not match that criteria, we see the above bug.

Address this by having ftrace ignore all locations in the text exit
sections of vmlinux.

Fixes: 0f71dcf ("powerpc/ftrace: Add support for -fpatchable-function-entry")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240213175410.1091313-1-naveen@kernel.org
@a-usr
Copy link

a-usr commented Jun 19, 2024

Sorry, but I dont see how people would have an easier time recognizing a pattern of tiny dots compared to regular letters.

@samwareing
Copy link

Visually impaired folks can, will and should use their screen reader (narration/braille tool) of choice.

This PR is, in my opinion, very ignorant.

Visually impaired people have better solutions to this universal problem, and this particular solution doesn't actually work.

@OTonGitHub
Copy link

Ain't no way

Copy link

@a-usr a-usr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are missing a somewhere

@yusuftogtay
Copy link

lol

intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2024
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree instead() of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
staging-kernelci-org pushed a commit to kernelci/linux that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2024
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
mj22226 pushed a commit to mj22226/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
commit 3c58a95 upstream.

In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
KexyBiscuit pushed a commit to AOSC-Tracking/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
commit 3c58a95 upstream.

In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ptr1337 pushed a commit to CachyOS/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
commit 3c58a95 upstream.

In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
1054009064 pushed a commit to 1054009064/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
commit 3c58a95 upstream.

In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs',
but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without
deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING:

==================================================================
remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests'
WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Modules linked in: netfs(-)
CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860
RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs]
 __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0
 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
==================================================================

Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to
fix the above problem.

Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240826113404.3214786-1-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ГОЙДА
@gmehdiev gmehdiev changed the title Add braille replaced readme with the text MOTHER Tatyana Kurtukova Oct 25, 2024
@gmehdiev gmehdiev closed this Oct 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.