Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update main.c #874

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Update main.c #874

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

MorphyKutay
Copy link

@MorphyKutay MorphyKutay commented May 16, 2024

The updated xbc_show_value function uses a recursive approach to print all the data in a boot configuration file. This function checks if a xbc_node is a value node. If it is, it prints the value to the screen. If not, it retrieves the child nodes of the current node and recursively calls the xbc_show_value function for each one. This allows all child nodes to be included in the output. This recursive approach effectively handles complex structures and nested data in a boot configuration file.

Yes, correct. The updated xbc_show_value function uses a recursive approach to print all the data in a boot configuration file. This function checks if a xbc_node is a value node. If it is, it prints the value to the screen. If not, it retrieves the child nodes of the current node and recursively calls the xbc_show_value function for each one. This allows all child nodes to be included in the output. This recursive approach effectively handles complex structures and nested data in a boot configuration file.
@MorphyKutay
Copy link
Author

++

@admsev
Copy link

admsev commented May 25, 2024

@gooroodev please review

@gooroodev
Copy link

gooroodev commented May 25, 2024

1. Summary of Changes

The changes in the pull request modify the xbc_show_value function in main.c. The function now handles nodes that are not values by recursively calling itself on child nodes. Specifically:

  • It checks if the node is a value using xbc_node_is_value(node).
  • If the node is a value, it iterates over the values using xbc_array_for_each_value.
  • If the node is not a value, it retrieves the child node using xbc_node_get_child and recursively processes each child node using xbc_show_value.
  • The loop continues until all child nodes are processed.

2. Issues, Bugs, or Typos

Issue 1: Missing Space After if

  • Code:
    if(xbc_node_is_value(node)){
  • Improved Code:
    if (xbc_node_is_value(node)) {

Issue 2: Missing Space After else

  • Code:
    }else{
  • Improved Code:
    } else {

3. General Review of Code Quality and Style

  • Readability: The code is generally readable, but it would benefit from consistent spacing around keywords and braces.
  • Recursion: The recursive approach for handling child nodes is appropriate and maintains the structure of the original function.
  • Error Handling: There is no error handling in the new code for cases where xbc_node_get_child or xbc_node_get_next might return NULL. This could be improved for robustness.
  • Variable Naming: The variable names are consistent with the original code, but more descriptive names could enhance readability.

Final Improved Code

static int xbc_show_value(struct xbc_node *node, bool semicolon)
{
	int i = 0;

	eol = semicolon ? ";\n" : "\n";
	if (xbc_node_is_value(node)) {
		xbc_array_for_each_value(node, val) {
			if (strchr(val, '"'))
				q = '\'';
			else
				q = '"';
			printf("%c%s%c%s", q, val, q, xbc_node_is_array(node) ? ", " : eol);
			i++;
		}
	} else {
		struct xbc_node *child = xbc_node_get_child(node);
		while (child) {
			i += xbc_show_value(child, semicolon);
			child = xbc_node_get_next(child);
		}
	}
	return i;
}

Additional Recommendations

  • Error Handling: Consider adding error handling for xbc_node_get_child and xbc_node_get_next to ensure the function handles NULL values gracefully.
  • Comments: Adding comments to explain the purpose of each block of code can improve maintainability.
  • Testing: Ensure that the function is thoroughly tested with various node structures to verify that both value and non-value nodes are handled correctly.

Yours, Gooroo.dev

@MorphyKutay MorphyKutay reopened this May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants