Skip to content

update ternary operator docs with no useMemo #38

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

update ternary operator docs with no useMemo #38

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions code/examples/ternary-operator.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ const status = A조건 && B조건 ? "BOTH" : 둘다아닌경우 ? "NONE" : A조
다음과 같이 조건을 `if` 문으로 풀어서 사용하면 보다 명확하고 간단하게 조건을 드러낼 수 있어요.

```typescript
const status = useMemo(() => {
const status = (() => {
if (A조건 && B조건) {
return "BOTH";
}
Expand All @@ -35,5 +35,5 @@ const status = useMemo(() => {
}

return "NONE";
}, [A조건, B조건]);
}, [A조건, B조건])();
```
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions en/code/examples/ternary-operator.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ This code uses multiple nested ternary operators, making it difficult to quickly
You can rewrite the conditions using `if` statements, as shown below, to make the logic clearer and easier to follow.

```typescript
const status = useMemo(() => {
const status = (() => {
if (ACondition && BCondition) {
return "BOTH";
}
Expand All @@ -35,5 +35,5 @@ const status = useMemo(() => {
}

return "NONE";
}, [ACondition, BCondition]);
}, [ACondition, BCondition])();
```