Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minor fix for attention docs #1205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged

minor fix for attention docs #1205

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

ashdtu
Copy link
Contributor

@ashdtu ashdtu commented Jan 31, 2024

Checklist

  • Confirmed that run-checks all script has been executed.
  • Made sure the book is up to date with changes in this PR.

Changes

Fix incorrect documentation for multi-head attention weights as pointed out in discord.

@ashdtu ashdtu requested a review from louisfd January 31, 2024 15:58
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (07c69bd) 84.44% compared to head (5ff06cc) 84.44%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1205   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.44%   84.44%           
=======================================
  Files         549      549           
  Lines       61909    61909           
=======================================
  Hits        52278    52278           
  Misses       9631     9631           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nathanielsimard nathanielsimard merged commit c620176 into main Jan 31, 2024
13 of 15 checks passed
@nathanielsimard nathanielsimard deleted the docs/attention branch January 31, 2024 16:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants