-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update protobuf #4394
base: mmilata/nixpkgs-bump2
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update protobuf #4394
Conversation
|
|
\n\x0bMessageType\x12(\n\x16MessageType_Initialize\x10\0\x1a\x0c\x80\xa6\ | ||
\x1d\x01\xb0\xb5\x18\x01\x90\xb5\x18\x01\x12\x1e\n\x10MessageType_Ping\ | ||
\n\x0bMessageType\x12(\n\x16MessageType_Initialize\x10\0\x1a\x0c\xb0\xb5\ | ||
\x18\x01\x80\xa6\x1d\x01\x90\xb5\x18\x01\x12\x1e\n\x10MessageType_Ping\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes in this file slightly suspicious.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's a reordering of the enum value options (wire_tiny = true, wire_in = true
). too lazy to decode to concrete values but i'd guess they match the order in which they were specified in messages.proto, and previously uhh dunno? lexicographic? order of option number?
Needs #4374.