Skip to content

Added overview pages for guides and examples, and improved examples #1314

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

D-K-P
Copy link
Member

@D-K-P D-K-P commented Sep 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a "Testing" section with JSON payload examples across multiple documentation files to enhance usability and understanding of various tasks (e.g., image generation, audio extraction, email sequences).
    • Added new introductory guides for using Trigger.dev with various frameworks and Supabase, improving navigability and clarity.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced logging and output structure for FFmpeg tasks, providing clearer messages and streamlined return values.
    • Updated the generateResumePDF task to improve traceability and adapt to Cloudflare R2.
  • Documentation

    • Added new files and sections to improve the overall documentation structure and provide practical task examples, including testing instructions for various tasks.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Sep 17, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: c3d0fec

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@D-K-P has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22fa84e and c3d0fec.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple documentation files related to Trigger.dev. Key changes include the addition of testing sections with JSON payload examples for various tasks, improvements in logging and output structures for video processing functions, and the introduction of new files that serve as guides for users. Overall, the updates aim to improve clarity and usability for developers working with the platform.

Changes

Files Change Summary
docs/examples/dall-e3-generate-image.mdx Added a "Testing" section with a JSON payload example for the generateContent task.
docs/examples/ffmpeg-video-processing.mdx Modified logging and return structures for ffmpegCompressVideo, ffmpegExtractAudio, and ffmpegGenerateThumbnail; added testing instructions.
docs/examples/intro.mdx Introduced an introductory guide for Trigger.dev with a structured table of example tasks.
docs/examples/open-ai-with-retrying.mdx Added a "Testing" section with a JSON payload example for the openaiTask function.
docs/examples/react-pdf.mdx Changed file extension to .tsx, updated import statements, enhanced logging, and added a testing section.
docs/examples/resend-email-sequence.mdx Added a "Testing" section with a JSON payload example for the emailSequence task.
docs/examples/sharp-image-processing.mdx Added a "Testing" section with a JSON payload example for the sharpProcessImage task.
docs/examples/vercel-ai-sdk.mdx Added a "Testing" section with a JSON payload example for the openaiTask function.
docs/mint.json Added new pages for frameworks and examples in the documentation structure.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Documentation
    participant Task
    User->>Documentation: Request for task information
    Documentation->>Task: Provide example payload
    Task-->>Documentation: Return task structure
    Documentation-->>User: Display task information
Loading

🐰 In the garden of code, changes bloom bright,
New guides and examples, a wonderful sight!
Testing made simple, with JSON to share,
Hop along, dear devs, there's magic in the air!
With each little update, our knowledge will grow,
Together we flourish, let creativity flow! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/snippets/card-nextjs.mdx (1)

20-20: Use the official spelling "Next.js" in the URL path.

To enhance clarity and consistency, update the href attribute to use the official spelling of the framework:

-href="/guides/frameworks/nextjs"
+href="/guides/frameworks/next.js"
Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Next.js”.
Context: ...s> } href="/guides/frameworks/nextjs" />

(NODE_JS)

docs/snippets/card-nodejs.mdx (1)

9-9: Nitpick: Use the official spelling "Node.js".

- href="/guides/frameworks/nodejs"
+ href="/guides/frameworks/nodejs"
Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~9-~9: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Node.js”.
Context: ...> } href="/guides/frameworks/nodejs" />

(NODE_JS)

docs/snippets/card-remix.mdx (1)

1-206: The Card component looks good! Just a couple of suggestions to consider.

The component is nicely structured with the icon and link props. The inline SVG provides good control over styling.

A few suggestions to consider:

  1. If the SVG is not expected to be customized via props, consider extracting it to a separate file (e.g., RemixLogo.svg) and importing it in the component. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the Card component.
  2. If this Card component is intended to be reused for linking to other guides or pages, consider making the href prop more generic instead of hardcoding the Remix guide link. This would improve the reusability of the component.

These are just suggestions to consider based on the intended usage of the component. The current implementation looks fine as is.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a84e601 and 7accaa4.

Files selected for processing (15)
  • docs/examples/dall-e3-generate-image.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/examples/ffmpeg-video-processing.mdx (6 hunks)
  • docs/examples/intro.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/examples/open-ai-with-retrying.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/examples/react-pdf.mdx (3 hunks)
  • docs/examples/resend-email-sequence.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/examples/sharp-image-processing.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/examples/vercel-ai-sdk.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/guides/frameworks/introduction.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/guides/frameworks/supabase-guides-overview.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/mint.json (3 hunks)
  • docs/snippets/card-nextjs.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/snippets/card-nodejs.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/snippets/card-remix.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs/snippets/card-supabase.mdx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • docs/examples/dall-e3-generate-image.mdx
  • docs/examples/intro.mdx
  • docs/examples/open-ai-with-retrying.mdx
  • docs/examples/sharp-image-processing.mdx
Additional context used
LanguageTool
docs/snippets/card-nextjs.mdx

[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Next.js”.
Context: ...s> } href="/guides/frameworks/nextjs" />

(NODE_JS)

docs/snippets/card-supabase.mdx

[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...l="white"/> } href="/guides/frameworks/supabase-guide...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

docs/snippets/card-nodejs.mdx

[uncategorized] ~9-~9: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Node.js”.
Context: ...> } href="/guides/frameworks/nodejs" />

(NODE_JS)

Additional comments not posted (27)
docs/guides/frameworks/introduction.mdx (2)

1-6: LGTM!

The metadata block is well-structured and provides clear and concise information about the purpose of the guide. The chosen icon seems appropriate for representing a collection of frameworks.


8-18: Great job on the component structure!

The imported card components and the CardGroup component provide a well-organized and visually appealing layout for presenting framework-specific information. The chosen frameworks are highly relevant and cater to a wide range of developers.

docs/guides/frameworks/supabase-guides-overview.mdx (3)

1-5: LGTM!

The metadata section is well-structured and provides clear information about the document's content and purpose.


7-22: LGTM!

The card group section is well-organized and provides clear, concise information about the available guides. The titles, icons, and descriptions effectively communicate the purpose and content of each guide, while the links ensure easy navigation to the respective pages.


1-22: Excellent work on the Supabase guides overview page!

The file is well-structured, with a clear separation between the metadata and content sections. The content is organized logically, making it easy for users to understand the available resources and navigate to the desired guide. The writing style is clear, concise, and appropriate for technical documentation, ensuring clarity for the target audience.

Overall, this overview page effectively serves its purpose and provides a valuable resource for users looking to integrate Supabase with Trigger.dev.

docs/examples/vercel-ai-sdk.mdx (1)

44-53: Great addition of a testing section with an example payload!

The new "Testing" section provides clear guidance on how to structure a request payload for the openaiTask function. The example payload with the prompt "What is the meaning of life?" is concise and illustrates the usage effectively.

Adding practical examples like this enhances the documentation and helps users understand how to utilize the function correctly.

docs/examples/react-pdf.mdx (4)

13-14: LGTM!

The <Info> component provides accurate and relevant information about the file extension requirement for using React components.


15-24: LGTM!

The code segment correctly imports the necessary dependencies and initializes the R2 client using environment variables for the endpoint and credentials.


Line range hint 34-72: LGTM!

The main logic of the generateResumePDF task is well-structured and properly implemented. It includes useful logging statements, correctly renders the PDF using react-pdf, generates a unique filename, sets the R2 key and upload parameters, uploads the PDF to R2, and returns the bucket and key for the uploaded file.


75-85: LGTM!

The addition of the testing section with a sample JSON payload is a valuable improvement to the documentation. It provides a clear example of how to test the task and helps users understand the expected input format.

docs/examples/resend-email-sequence.mdx (1)

71-84: Great addition of a testing section with an example payload!

The new "Testing" section provides a clear and practical example of how to test the emailSequence task. The JSON payload example outlines the required fields (userId, email, name) and their expected types, making it easy for users to understand how to construct the input data.

Prompting the user to replace the email field with their own test email is a good practice to avoid accidentally sending emails to unintended recipients during testing.

Overall, this addition enhances the documentation's usability and clarity by offering a concrete testing example that aligns with the task's expected input.

docs/snippets/card-nextjs.mdx (2)

3-19: LGTM!

The inline SVG icon is implemented correctly:

  • The SVG syntax is valid.
  • The decorative nature of the icon doesn't require additional accessibility attributes.
  • The clipPath is defined and used appropriately.

20-20: LGTM!

The href attribute is correctly set to link to the Next.js framework guide. The relative path format is valid.

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Next.js”.
Context: ...s> } href="/guides/frameworks/nextjs" />

(NODE_JS)

docs/snippets/card-supabase.mdx (2)

1-34: LGTM!

The Card component implementation looks good:

  • The component structure and prop usage is correct.
  • The complex SVG icon is valid and should render the desired graphic.
  • The relative URL href prop is valid and links to the correct page.
Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...l="white"/> } href="/guides/frameworks/supabase-guide...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


31-31: Ignore the static analysis hint.

The hint about loose punctuation can be ignored. The } character flagged on line 31 is correctly used to close the JSX expression for the icon prop. It's not a punctuation error.

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...l="white"/> } href="/guides/frameworks/supabase-guide...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

docs/snippets/card-nodejs.mdx (1)

1-11: LGTM!

The Card component is structured correctly with the icon and href props. The SVG graphic in the icon prop is syntactically valid, and the href prop correctly links to the Node.js guides.

Tools
LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~9-~9: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Node.js”.
Context: ...> } href="/guides/frameworks/nodejs" />

(NODE_JS)

docs/mint.json (3)

248-248: LGTM!

Adding an introductory guide for frameworks is a helpful addition to provide an overview and context to users. The placement under the "Frameworks" group is appropriate.


258-258: Looks good!

Adding an overview for Supabase guides is beneficial to provide a high-level view of the available Supabase related content. The placement under the "Supabase" subgroup within the "Frameworks" group is appropriate.


276-276: Looks great!

Adding an introductory page for examples is a good practice to provide context or guidance for the various examples listed. The placement under the "Examples" group is appropriate.

docs/examples/ffmpeg-video-processing.mdx (8)

105-105: LGTM!

The logging statement provides useful information about the temporary compressed video file.


107-107: LGTM!

Using the base name of the output path for the R2 key is a good approach to generate a unique key.


118-118: LGTM!

The logging statement provides useful information about the compressed video being saved to the R2 bucket.


122-122: LGTM!

The logging statement provides useful information about the temporary compressed video file being deleted.


124-128: LGTM!

Returning the R2 bucket and key instead of the URL is a good approach to keep the return value concise.


133-141: LGTM!

Providing testing instructions is helpful for users to understand how to test the task. The JSON payload structure clearly shows the expected input for the task.


182-236: LGTM!

The changes to the logging statements provide clearer messages about the audio extraction process. Returning the R2 bucket and key instead of the URL is consistent with the changes made in the ffmpegCompressVideo task. The warning about providing a video URL with audio is helpful to prevent task failures.


Line range hint 242-360: LGTM!

Providing testing instructions is helpful for users to understand how to test the tasks. The JSON payload structures clearly show the expected input for the tasks. The ffmpegGenerateThumbnail task follows a similar structure to the other tasks, with clear logging statements and a concise return value.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 17, 2024

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/build@1314
pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/core@1314
pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev@1314
pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/@trigger.dev/sdk@1314

commit: c3d0fec

@D-K-P D-K-P merged commit 382ce8d into main Sep 18, 2024
10 checks passed
@D-K-P D-K-P deleted the docs/improvements branch September 26, 2024 10:11
This was referenced Sep 27, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 4, 2024
3 tasks
This was referenced Nov 27, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2024
This was referenced Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants