-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 708
Fix various dependabot alerts #2063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThis update revises dependency versions in the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/webapp/server.ts
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
// Mitigate against https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/dependabot/128 | ||
// by not allowing 2000+ headers to be sent and causing a DoS | ||
// headers will instead be limited by the maxHeaderSize | ||
server.maxHeadersCount = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the intended behavior of setting maxHeadersCount = 0
Setting maxHeadersCount = 0
in Node.js HTTP server typically means "unlimited" or "no limit" on the number of headers, which seems contradictory to the stated goal of preventing DoS attacks from 2000+ headers.
In standard Node.js behavior:
- Default value is 2000
- Setting to 0 means "unlimited headers"
This configuration might not achieve the intended security mitigation unless there's additional context about how your specific Node.js environment interprets this value.
Please verify the expected behavior with this script:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Node.js documentation for maxHeadersCount behavior
# Find Node.js version used in the project
node -v
# Search for relevant information in Node.js documentation
curl -s https://nodejs.org/api/http.html | grep -A 10 "maxHeadersCount"
# Look for other HTTP header limit settings in the codebase
grep -r "maxHeaderSize\|headersTimeout" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" .
Length of output: 6692
Adjust maxHeadersCount
to enforce a header-count limit
The Node.js docs confirm that server.maxHeadersCount = 0
actually disables the header-count limit (default is 2000), so this override makes your server accept unlimited headers rather than capping them. To mitigate a DoS via excessive headers you should either:
• Remove the override entirely and rely on the default (2000)
• Or set a lower, positive limit (e.g. 1000) that fits your threat model
Please update in apps/webapp/server.ts
(lines 132–135):
- // Mitigate against https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/dependabot/128
- // by not allowing 2000+ headers to be sent and causing a DoS
- // headers will instead be limited by the maxHeaderSize
- server.maxHeadersCount = 0;
+ // Mitigate against https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/dependabot/128
+ // by capping the number of headers; rely on header-size limits for payload size
+ // Remove override to use default (2000) or choose a custom cap:
+ server.maxHeadersCount = 1000; // e.g. limit to 1000 headers
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
// Mitigate against https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/dependabot/128 | |
// by not allowing 2000+ headers to be sent and causing a DoS | |
// headers will instead be limited by the maxHeaderSize | |
server.maxHeadersCount = 0; | |
// Mitigate against https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/dependabot/128 | |
// by capping the number of headers; rely on header-size limits for payload size | |
// Remove override to use default (2000) or choose a custom cap: | |
server.maxHeadersCount = 1000; // e.g. limit to 1000 headers |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/webapp/server.ts around lines 132 to 135, the current setting of
server.maxHeadersCount = 0 disables the header count limit, allowing unlimited
headers, which contradicts the intended DoS mitigation. To fix this, either
remove this override to use the default limit of 2000 headers or set
maxHeadersCount to a positive integer like 1000 to enforce a stricter limit that
fits your security requirements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts.new/route.tsx (1)
170-209
: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Verify error handling consistency across the file
The changes standardize error handling for the two specific error cases, but you might want to confirm that all other potential error cases in this action handler are also standardized.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of directly assigned error strings in route files rg "submission\.error\.[a-zA-Z]+ = \"" --type=tsx --glob="**/app/routes/**" -A 1 -B 1Length of output: 114
The previous
rg --type=tsx
failed in this environment—let’s retry by using a glob for.ts
and.tsx
files:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining direct assignments to submission.error.* in route files rg "submission\.error\.\w+\s*=" --glob "**/app/routes/**/*.{ts,tsx}" -n -B1 -A1Length of output: 4057
Standardize form error handling across route handlers
We’ve identified direct
submission.error.*
assignments in multiple routes using different properties (key
,message
,variables
), which can lead to inconsistencies in how errors are surfaced in the UI. Please align all handlers to a single, shared pattern:• apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts.new/route.tsx (lines 189, 201) –
submission.error.key
• apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.feedback.ts (line 86) –submission.error.message
• apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.environment-variables/route.tsx (lines 145, 155, 178) –submission.error.key
• apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts/route.tsx (line 125) –submission.error.key
• apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx (lines 148, 165) –submission.error.key
&submission.error.variables
Recommendations:
- Choose one error field (e.g.
error.key
) for validation errors and use it everywhere.- Extract shared error-assignment logic into a helper to reduce duplication.
- Update each handler to consume and return errors via the unified schema.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts.new/route.tsx (1)
4-209
: Consider enhancing error messages with more detailsThe standardized error messages are quite generic. For better debugging and user experience, consider enhancing them with more specific information.
For example:
- submission.error.key = ["Project not found"]; + submission.error.key = [`Project with slug "${projectParam}" not found`];- submission.error.key = ["Failed to create alert channel"]; + submission.error.key = [`Failed to create alert channel: ${alertChannel?.error || "Unknown error"}`];
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yaml
is excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts.new/route.tsx
(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts/route.tsx
(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx
(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.environment-variables/route.tsx
(3 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.promote.ts
(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.retry-indexing.ts
(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.rollback.ts
(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.feedback.ts
(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.taskruns.$runParam.cancel.ts
(1 hunks)apps/webapp/package.json
(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/webapp/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.retry-indexing.ts (1)
packages/core/src/v3/apps/http.ts (1)
json
(65-75)
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.rollback.ts (1)
packages/core/src/v3/apps/http.ts (1)
json
(65-75)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
- GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts/route.tsx (1)
125-125
: Error message standardization looks good.The change from string to array format for error messages is consistent with the PR objective of fixing dependency alerts. This standardization ensures compatibility with updated libraries.
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.feedback.ts (1)
86-86
: Error message standardization looks good.Converting the error message to an array format is consistent with the pattern applied across the application, ensuring compatibility with updated dependencies.
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.taskruns.$runParam.cancel.ts (1)
35-35
: Error format standardization looks good.The change from a string to an array containing the error message aligns with the pattern applied throughout the codebase, ensuring consistent error handling.
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.retry-indexing.ts (1)
96-96
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Error standardization looks good, but check error key naming.
The format change to arrays is consistent with other files, but note that the error key is
runParam
in a deployment-related file. While this might be intentional for error handling consistency, consider whether it accurately represents the context.Also applies to: 104-104
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the runParam key is used consistently in deployment-related files echo "Checking for runParam usage in deployment files..." rg -l "runParam" "apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.\$projectId.deployments"Length of output: 281
#!/bin/bash # Search for 'runParam' usage across all route files echo "🔍 Searching for 'runParam' in route files..." rg -H --color=never "runParam" apps/webapp/app/routes # Search for all instances of submission.error assignments in deployment-related files echo "🔍 Searching for 'submission.error =' in deployment-related routes..." rg -H --color=never "submission.error" -g "apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.*.deployments.*.ts"
Review: Validate
runParam
error key in retry-indexing routeEnsure that using
runParam
accurately describes the context in this deployment–retry route and aligns with your app’s error-handling schema. If you don’t see this key used elsewhere, consider whether a more descriptive name (e.g.retryParams
ordeploymentParams
) might be clearer.• apps/webapp/app/routes/resources/[projectId]/deployments/[deploymentShortCode]/retry-indexing.ts: line 96
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.rollback.ts (2)
85-85
: Standardized error message formatThe error message for failed deployment rollbacks is now wrapped in an array, making the error handling consistent with other routes in the application.
89-89
: Standardized non-Error exception handlingThe JSON-stringified error for non-Error exceptions is now wrapped in an array, consistent with the pattern used throughout the application.
apps/webapp/app/routes/resources.$projectId.deployments.$deploymentShortCode.promote.ts (2)
82-82
: Standardized error message formatThe error message for failed deployment promotions is now wrapped in an array, making the error handling consistent with other routes in the application.
86-86
: Standardized non-Error exception handlingThe JSON-stringified error for non-Error exceptions is now wrapped in an array, consistent with the pattern used throughout the application.
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.environment-variables/route.tsx (3)
145-145
: Standardized error message formatThe "Project not found" error message is now wrapped in an array, making the error handling consistent with other routes in the application.
155-155
: Standardized error format for variable editingThe error message for failed environment variable edits is now wrapped in an array, consistent with the pattern used throughout the application.
178-178
: Standardized error format for variable deletionThe error message for failed environment variable deletions is now wrapped in an array, consistent with the pattern used throughout the application.
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx (3)
148-148
: Standardized error message formatThe "Project not found" error message is now wrapped in an array, making the error handling consistent with other routes in the application.
161-162
: Standardized error format for individual variablesVariable-specific error messages are now wrapped in arrays, maintaining consistency with the error handling pattern used throughout the application.
165-165
: Standardized error format for general variable errorsThe general error message for environment variables is now wrapped in an array, consistent with the pattern used throughout the application.
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.$projectParam.env.$envParam.alerts.new/route.tsx (2)
189-189
: Error handling standardized to use arraysThis change standardizes the error format by wrapping the error message in an array, which is consistent with other error handling patterns across the application.
201-201
: Error handling standardized to use arraysThis change standardizes the error format by wrapping the error message in an array, which is consistent with other error handling patterns across the application.
Testing:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit