-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 580
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes to fix errors in LCM #9831
Conversation
Status Flag 'Pre-Test Inspection' - Auto Inspected - Inspection Is Not Necessary for this Pull Request. |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Testing Jenkins Projects: Pull Request Auto Testing STARTING (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0_serial
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0_debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_intel_17.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_10.1.105
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_10.1.105_uvm_off
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_clang_10.0.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: python-3
Jenkins Parameters
Using Repos:
Pull Request Author: lxmota |
I just tested this and am getting the following compilation errors in Albany:
Did you encounter this @lxmota ? |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Jenkins Testing: all Jobs PASSED Pull Request Auto Testing has PASSED (click to expand)Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_8.3.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0_serial
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_gcc_7.2.0_debug
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_intel_17.0.1
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_10.1.105
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_cuda_10.1.105_uvm_off
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: Trilinos_pullrequest_clang_10.0.0
Jenkins Parameters
Build InformationTest Name: python-3
Jenkins Parameters
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - - This Pull Request Requires Inspection... The code must be inspected by a member of the Team before Testing/Merging |
All Jobs Finished; status = PASSED, However Inspection must be performed before merge can occur... |
Yes, LCM needs to be changed as well. I have the commits that fix this waiting in the wings for the Trilinos changes. Sorry, I just saw this.
Alejandro
From: "Irina K. Tezaur" ***@***.***>
Reply-To: trilinos/Trilinos ***@***.***>
Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 20:47
To: trilinos/Trilinos ***@***.***>
Cc: "Mota, Alejandro" ***@***.***>, Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [trilinos/Trilinos] Changes to fix errors in LCM (PR #9831)
I just tested this and am getting the following compilation errors in Albany:
In file included from /home/ikalash/ACE/Albany-LCM-master/src/LCM/models/CrystalPlasticityModel.cpp:7:
/home/ikalash/ACE/Albany-LCM-master/src/LCM/models/CrystalPlasticityModel_Def.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void LCM::CrystalPlasticityKernel<EvalT, Traits>::operator()(int, int) const [with EvalT = PHAL::AlbanyTraits::Jacobian; Traits = PHAL::AlbanyTraits]’:
/home/ikalash/ACE/Albany-LCM-master/src/LCM/models/CrystalPlasticityModel.cpp:19:1: required from here
/home/ikalash/ACE/Albany-LCM-master/src/LCM/models/CrystalPlasticityModel_Def.hpp:615:41: error: no match for ‘operator=’ (operand types are ‘boost::tuples::detail::tie_mapper<minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>, minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>, minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>, void, void, void, void, void, void, void>::type’ {aka ‘boost::tuples::tuple<minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>&, minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>&, minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>&, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type, boost::tuples::null_type>’} and ‘std::tuple<minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>, minitensor::Tensor<double, 48>, minitensor::Tensor<double, 48> >’)
Did you encounter this @lxmota<https://github.com/lxmota> ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#9831 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWKJAP3OV4SZHJYLM6JOTDUHY3UTANCNFSM5GKQ7WTQ>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
Status Flag 'Pre-Merge Inspection' - SUCCESS: The last commit to this Pull Request has been INSPECTED AND APPROVED by [ ikalash ]! |
Status Flag 'Pull Request AutoTester' - Pull Request will be Automerged |
Merge on Pull Request# 9831: IS A SUCCESS - Pull Request successfully merged |
@trilinos/discretizations
Motivation
Recent changes to MiniTensor led to compile errors in LCM
Stakeholder Feedback
Testing