Increase level for verbose log

[rgmz]

Description:

This bumps skipping file: extension is ignored from --debug to --trace as it can be quite noisy.

Checklist:

• Tests passing (make test-community)?
• Lint passing (make lint this requires golangci-lint)?

[ahrav]

Description:

This bumps skipping file: extension is ignored from --debug to --trace as it can be quite noisy.

Checklist:

• Tests passing (make test-community)?
• Lint passing (make lint this requires golangci-lint)?

I see you had a change of heart 😉
#3383 (comment)

EDIT: I have no idea why i hit "Quote reply" instead of leaving a regular comment. 🤦

[rgmz]

Lol, I am torn on it. Maybe it's fine, idk.

I think part of the problem is that you can't specify a level so it's all or nothing. There's a lot of stuff in 3 & 4 that I'd like to see without 5.

[ahrav]

I think part of the problem is that you can't specify a level

+1000 to this. I’ve always found the way we map log levels to CLI flags a bit puzzling. I don’t have strong opinions on what level this should be, but if we stick with level 3, we should update the contributing.md here 🤣

[ahrav]

Approving even though it doesn't actually have any effect. 😅

[dustin-decker]

I think part of the problem is that you can't specify a level

+1000 to this. I’ve always found the way we map log levels to CLI flags a bit puzzling. I don’t have strong opinions on what level this should be, but if we stick with level 3, we should update the contributing.md here 🤣

Those CLI flags predated our leveled logger