Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HOLD: Support for guardduty exports #63

Closed

Conversation

pjdufour-dds
Copy link
Contributor

@pjdufour-dds pjdufour-dds commented Apr 10, 2020

This PR includes support for GuardDuty logs. I also added some comments to the source code on why the paths are what they are. Now sure where you'd like those to be located.

@pjdufour-dds pjdufour-dds force-pushed the guardduty_new_version branch from a0e7e3a to bfcbb51 Compare April 10, 2020 20:14
Copy link
Contributor

@dynamike dynamike left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test so we know this is working? Let me know if you need help with that.

@pjdufour-dds
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll try to get to this next week.

@pjdufour-dds pjdufour-dds requested a review from dynamike May 27, 2020 14:28
@pjdufour-dds
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added a test. Since GuardDuty exports still need to be manually configured, not sure if more is required for the test. hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#10920

@pjdufour-dds pjdufour-dds force-pushed the guardduty_new_version branch from 3a9e757 to d614b3c Compare July 22, 2020 14:41
@pjdufour-dds
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased with master

@dynamike
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like they added support for exports via terraform. Could you update your tests to use it?

hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#13894

@pjdufour-dds pjdufour-dds mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2020
@pjdufour-dds
Copy link
Contributor Author

Holding for #60

@pjdufour-dds pjdufour-dds changed the title Support for guardduty exports HOLD: Support for guardduty exports Sep 1, 2020
@dynamike dynamike removed their request for review September 24, 2020 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants