feat:Update README with installation instructions and usage examples #52
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive renaming of properties within the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant Serializer
User->>API: Request data
API->>Serializer: Serialize request with updated types
Serializer-->>API: Return serialized data
API-->>User: Send response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPostResponse.g.cs (1)
6-8: Add a meaningful class-level description.The class-level XML documentation comment is empty. Consider adding a brief description of the purpose and usage of the
ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPostResponseclass to improve code readability and maintainability.src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SendSsoEmailConfirmationApiV1SsoEmailVerificationSendPostResponse.g.cs (1)
6-8: Add a brief description of the class in the XML documentation comment.The XML documentation comment for the class is empty. It's a good practice to provide a brief description of the class to help other developers understand its purpose.
Fill the XML documentation comment with a brief description of the class, such as:
/// <summary> -/// +/// Represents the response model for the POST request to the SSO email verification send API endpoint. /// </summary>src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationStatusRequest.g.cs (3)
6-8: Add a meaningful class summary.The class summary is empty. Consider adding a brief description of the purpose and usage of the
SSOEmailVerificationStatusRequestclass to improve code readability and maintainability.
11-13: Add a meaningful property summary.The summary for the
18-20: Add a meaningful property summary.The summary for the
SamlProviderIdproperty is empty. Consider adding a brief description of what the SAML provider ID represents and how it is used to improve code readability and maintainability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.CheckSsoEmailVerificationStatusApiV1SsoEmailVerificationStatusPost.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPost.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.GetSsoSettingsApiV1SsoSettingsSsoLoginSlugGet.g.cs (4 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.SendSsoEmailConfirmationApiV1SsoEmailVerificationSendPost.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPostResponse.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOConfirmEmailRequest.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationSendRequest.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationStatusRequest.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationStatusResponse.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SendSsoEmailConfirmationApiV1SsoEmailVerificationSendPostResponse.g.cs (1 hunks)
- src/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (45)
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPostResponse.g.cs (1)
1-18: Code changes are approved.The code follows the necessary conventions for auto-generated response models and is structurally sound.
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SendSsoEmailConfirmationApiV1SsoEmailVerificationSendPostResponse.g.cs (1)
12-16: LGTM!The
AdditionalPropertiesproperty is well-defined and properly documented.src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOConfirmEmailRequest.g.cs (1)
1-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationStatusResponse.g.cs (2)
16-18: LGTM!The
EmailConfirmedAtproperty is correctly defined as a nullable property of typeglobal::System.AnyOf<global::System.DateTime?, object>?. TheJsonPropertyNameandJsonConverterattributes are used appropriately.
23-24: LGTM!The
AdditionalPropertiesproperty is correctly defined as a dictionary of string keys and object values. TheJsonExtensionDataattribute is used appropriately, and the property is initialized with an empty dictionary to ensure that it is never null.src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationSendRequest.g.cs (1)
1-31: LGTM!The
SSOEmailVerificationSendRequestclass is well-structured and follows C# best practices:
- The class is appropriately declared as
sealedandpartial, which is suitable for a generated class.- The
SamlProviderIdproperties are correctly marked asrequiredand have the appropriate JSON attributes for serialization.- The
AdditionalPropertiesproperty with theJsonExtensionDataattribute is a good pattern for handling additional JSON properties that are not explicitly defined in the class.The code changes are approved.
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.Models.SSOEmailVerificationStatusRequest.g.cs (1)
25-29: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.GetSsoSettingsApiV1SsoSettingsSsoLoginSlugGet.g.cs (7)
6-6: LGTM!The class name change from
PublicClienttoAuthClientis approved.
8-10: LGTM!The method name change is approved.
11-14: LGTM!The method name change is approved.
15-18: LGTM!The method name change is approved.
Line range hint
19-23: LGTM!The method name change is approved.
31-34: LGTM!The method name change is approved.
43-43: Verify the impact of the URI change on the API consumers.The URI construction within the method has been modified to remove the "public" segment from the endpoint. This change suggests a potential change in the accessibility or categorization of the SSO settings API.
Ensure that this change is thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected and that all API consumers have been updated to use the new endpoint.
Run the following script to verify the API usage:
Verification successful
URI Change Impact is Localized
The change to the URI in the
GetSsoSettingsApiV1SsoSettingsSsoLoginSlugGetmethod is localized to its own file and does not have any references elsewhere in the codebase. This suggests that the impact on API consumers is minimal, and no other components are directly affected by this change.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all API calls to the SSO settings endpoint match the new URI. # Test: Search for the API usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new URI. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'/api/v1/sso/settings/'Length of output: 1017
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to the class or method where the URI is constructed to check for potential impacts. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'LangSmith.AuthClient.GetSsoSettingsApiV1SsoSettingsSsoLoginSlugGet'Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for any occurrences of the class or method name in the codebase. rg 'GetSsoSettingsApiV1SsoSettingsSsoLoginSlugGet' --type csharp -A 5Length of output: 7231
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPost.g.cs (2)
31-96: LGTM!The
ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPostAsyncmethod is well-implemented and follows best practices for making HTTP requests and processing responses in C#. The method signature and XML documentation provide clear information about the purpose and parameters of the method. The method handles potential exceptions and ensures that the response is successful before deserializing the response content. The method also provides extension points through partial methods for customizing the request and response processing.
105-117: LGTM!The
ConfirmSsoUserEmailApiV1SsoEmailVerificationConfirmPostAsyncmethod overload provides a convenient way to confirm the email of an SSO user by accepting thetokendirectly as a parameter. It creates the necessary request object and delegates the actual confirmation logic to the other overload of the method. This overload simplifies the usage of the API for clients who only need to provide the token.src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.SendSsoEmailConfirmationApiV1SsoEmailVerificationSendPost.g.cs (2)
31-96: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The method is well-structured, follows best practices, and has appropriate error handling and documentation.
106-120: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The method provides a convenient overload for the previous method and is well-implemented.
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/LangSmith.AuthClient.CheckSsoEmailVerificationStatusApiV1SsoEmailVerificationStatusPost.g.cs (2)
31-96: LGTM!The method follows a standard pattern for making an HTTP request and processing the response. It uses the
HttpClientto send the request and theSystem.Text.Jsonnamespace to serialize and deserialize the request and response objects. It handles errors by throwing exceptions with appropriate messages. It also uses partial methods to allow customization of the request and response processing.The code changes are approved.
106-120: LGTM!The method is a convenience method that allows the caller to pass the
samlProviderIdparameters directly instead of constructing aSSOEmailVerificationStatusRequestobject. It simply delegates to the other overload of the method.The code changes are approved.
src/libs/LangSmith/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs (20)
2316-2317: Property rename looks good.The property
Type575is correctly renamed fromSSOProvidertoSSOConfirmEmailRequest.
2320-2321: Property rename looks good.The property
Type576is correctly renamed fromSSOProviderSlimtoSSOEmailVerificationSendRequest.
2324-2325: Property rename looks good.The property
Type577is correctly renamed fromSSOSettingsCreatetoSSOEmailVerificationStatusRequest.
2328-2329: Property rename looks good.The property
Type578is correctly renamed fromSSOSettingsCreateAttributeMappingtoSSOEmailVerificationStatusResponse.
2332-2333: Property rename looks good.The property
Type579is correctly renamed fromSSOSettingsDefaultsUpdatetoSSOProvider.
2336-2337: Property rename looks good.The property
Type580is correctly renamed fromSearchDatasetRequesttoSSOProviderSlim.
2340-2341: Property rename looks good.The property
Type581is correctly renamed fromSearchDatasetRequestInputstoSSOSettingsCreate.
2344-2345: Property rename looks good.The property
Type582is correctly renamed fromSearchDatasetResponsetoSSOSettingsCreateAttributeMapping.
2348-2349: Property rename looks good.The property
Type583is correctly renamed fromIList<SearchedFewShotExample>toSSOSettingsDefaultsUpdate.
2352-2353: Property rename looks good.The property
Type584is correctly renamed fromSearchedFewShotExampletoSearchDatasetRequest.
2356-2357: Property rename looks good.The property
Type585is correctly renamed fromSearchedFewShotExampleInputstoSearchDatasetRequestInputs.
2360-2361: Property rename looks good.The property
Type586is correctly renamed fromSearchedFewShotExampleOutputstoSearchDatasetResponse.
2364-2365: Property rename looks good.The property
Type587is correctly renamed fromAnyOf<SearchedFewShotExampleDebugInfo, object>toIList<SearchedFewShotExample>.
2368-2369: Property rename looks good.The property
Type588is correctly renamed fromSearchedFewShotExampleDebugInfotoSearchedFewShotExample.
2372-2373: Property rename looks good.The property
Type589is correctly renamed fromSecretKeytoSearchedFewShotExampleInputs.
2376-2377: Property rename looks good.The property
Type590is correctly renamed fromSecretUpserttoSearchedFewShotExampleOutputs.
2380-2381: Property rename looks good.The property
Type591is correctly renamed fromServiceAccounttoAnyOf<SearchedFewShotExampleDebugInfo, object>.
2384-2385: Property rename looks good.The property
Type592is correctly renamed fromServiceAccountCreateRequesttoSearchedFewShotExampleDebugInfo.
2388-2389: Property rename looks good.The property
Type593is correctly renamed fromServiceAccountCreateResponsetoSecretKey.
2392-2393: Property rename looks good.The property
Type594is correctly renamed fromServiceAccountDeleteResponsetoSecretUpsert.
[approvesrc/libs/LangSmith/openapi.yaml (5)
1441-1469: LGTM!The new endpoint
/api/v1/sso/email-verification/sendfor sending SSO email confirmation looks good.
1470-1496: LGTM!The new endpoint
/api/v1/sso/email-verification/statusfor checking SSO email verification status looks good.
1497-1522: LGTM!The new endpoint
/api/v1/sso/email-verification/confirmfor confirming SSO user email looks good.
1523-1552: LGTM!The new endpoint
/api/v1/sso/settings/{sso_login_slug}for getting SSO provider settings looks good.
16661-16707: LGTM!The new schema definitions
SSOConfirmEmailRequest,SSOEmailVerificationSendRequest,SSOEmailVerificationStatusRequest, andSSOEmailVerificationStatusResponselook good. They follow the OpenAPI specification correctly and enhance the API's structure and validation capabilities.
Summary by CodeRabbit