Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ecmascript): is_loosely_equal and is_strictly_equal #53

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 4, 2023

Conversation

eliassjogreen
Copy link
Member

@eliassjogreen eliassjogreen commented Oct 31, 2023

This pr implements the is_loosely_equal and is_strictly_equal operators. is_loosely_equal still contains some todo!s for the stuff I was unsure about, mostly having to do with bigint related operations.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aapoalas aapoalas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work, thanks for doing this! A few issues are repeating regarding interpretation of spec text, essentially. Just a tad bit of repetitive logic work.

Co-authored-by: vimirage <vimirage@mirror.simplelogin.com>
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 1, 2023

LGTM besides the code splitting request (#53 (comment)).
The request to modify the implementation from the spec is totally optional, I can do it myself later if I really care.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aapoalas aapoalas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nice work and thanks a lot! <3

@eliassjogreen eliassjogreen force-pushed the feat/is-strictly-or-loosely-equal branch from 773d8cb to 4990b6a Compare November 2, 2023 08:51
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 2, 2023

LGTM. Aapo should merge soon

@sno2 sno2 merged commit a0cbd56 into trynova:main Nov 4, 2023
1 check passed
@sno2
Copy link
Contributor

sno2 commented Nov 4, 2023

Thank you

@andreubotella andreubotella mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants