Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump the npm group across 1 directory with 22 updates #469

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
44 changes: 22 additions & 22 deletions package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,61 +19,61 @@
"inject:protocol": "scripts/inject-protocol.sh && prettier --write ."
},
"devDependencies": {
"@astrojs/check": "^0.8.1",
"@astrojs/ts-plugin": "^1.1.3",
"@astrojs/check": "^0.9.3",
"@astrojs/ts-plugin": "^1.10.1",
"@types/eslint": "^8.44.2",
"@types/lodash-es": "^4.17.9",
"@types/mapbox__rehype-prism": "^0.8.0",
"@types/lodash-es": "^4.17.12",
"@types/mapbox__rehype-prism": "^0.8.3",
"@types/node": "^18.17.14",
"@types/react": "^18.2.21",
"@types/react": "^18.3.5",
"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^6.5.0",
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "^6.5.0",
"autoprefixer": "^10.4.15",
"concurrently": "^8.2.1",
"autoprefixer": "^10.4.20",
"concurrently": "^8.2.2",
"cssnano": "^6.0.1",
"eslint": "^8.48.0",
"eslint-config-prettier": "^9.0.0",
"eslint-config-prettier": "^9.1.0",
"eslint-plugin-astro": "^0.29.0",
"eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y": "^6.7.1",
"eslint-plugin-react": "^7.33.2",
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "^4.6.0",
"postcss": "^8.4.31",
"postcss-html": "^1.5.0",
"eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y": "^6.9.0",
"eslint-plugin-react": "^7.35.0",
"eslint-plugin-react-hooks": "^4.6.2",
"postcss": "^8.4.42",
"postcss-html": "^1.7.0",
"postcss-preset-env": "^9.1.3",
"prettier": "^3.0.3",
"prettier-plugin-astro": "^0.12.0",
"prettier": "^3.3.3",
"prettier-plugin-astro": "^0.14.1",
"stylelint": "^15.10.3",
"stylelint-config-astro": "^1.0.4",
"stylelint-config-standard": "^34.0.0",
"stylelint-plugin-logical-css": "^0.13.2",
"typescript": "^5.2.2",
"typescript-plugin-css-modules": "^5.0.1"
"typescript": "^5.5.4",
"typescript-plugin-css-modules": "^5.1.0"
},
"dependencies": {
"@astrojs/mdx": "^1.1.5",
"@astrojs/preact": "~3.0.0",
"@astrojs/preact": "~3.5.2",
"@astrojs/rss": "^4.0.7",
"@astrojs/sitemap": "^3.1.6",
"@octokit/core": "^5.0.0",
"@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest": "^8.0.0",
"@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods": "^9.0.0",
"@octokit/plugin-retry": "^6.0.0",
"@octokit/plugin-throttling": "^8.0.0",
"@preact/signals": "^1.2.1",
"@preact/signals": "^1.3.0",
"astro": "^3.6.5",
"clsx": "^2.0.0",
"clsx": "^2.1.1",
"cross-fetch": "^4.0.0",
"lodash-es": "^4.17.21",
"modern-normalize": "^2.0.0",
"preact": "^10.17.1",
"preact": "^10.23.2",
"pretty-bytes": "^6.1.1",
"rehype-autolink-headings": "^6.1.1",
"rehype-stringify": "^9.0.3",
"remark-parse": "^10.0.2",
"remark-rehype": "^10.1.0",
"remark-toc": "^8.0.1",
"s-ago": "^2.2.0",
"sharp": "^0.32.6",
"sharp": "^0.33.5",
"timeago.js": "^4.0.2",
"ts-is-present": "^1.2.2",
"tus-js-client": "^3.1.1",
Expand Down
7 changes: 3 additions & 4 deletions src/content/blog/2016-03-07-tus-s3-backend.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -136,10 +136,9 @@ technologies include
[ZooKeeper](https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.1.2/recipes.html#sc_recipes_Locks)
or [Consul](https://www.consul.io/docs/commands/lock.html), but not AWS S3 as it
does not offer absolute consistency. Since they do promise "read-after-write
consistency for PUTS of new objects in your S3 bucket [but only] eventual
consistency for overwrite PUTS and DELETES", this cannot be used to build a
distributed lock upon. Therefore, you are recommended to use a third-party
system for doing so.
consistency for PUTS of new objects in your S3 bucket [but only] eventual consistency
for overwrite PUTS and DELETES", this cannot be used to build a distributed lock
upon. Therefore, you are recommended to use a third-party system for doing so.

Another option for preventing concurrent uploading is to put the responsibility
on the client's side by saying it is their task to prevent multiple accesses to
Expand Down
Loading