Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use license object instead of licenses array #12605

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2014
Merged

Use license object instead of licenses array #12605

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2014

Conversation

zlatanvasovic
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cvrebert cvrebert added the meta label Feb 6, 2014
@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member

XhmikosR commented Feb 6, 2014

Makes sense, since one license is specified. @cvrebert : should I merge it or do you want to do it yourself?

@XhmikosR XhmikosR added this to the v3.1.1 milestone Feb 6, 2014
@cvrebert
Copy link
Collaborator

cvrebert commented Feb 6, 2014

@XhmikosR Go for it. 👍

@zlatanvasovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@XhmikosR Also, congrats on becoming BS team member! 👍

XhmikosR added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2014
Use license object instead of licenses array
@XhmikosR XhmikosR merged commit 119ed54 into twbs:master Feb 6, 2014
@XhmikosR
Copy link
Member

XhmikosR commented Feb 6, 2014

Thanks!

@cvrebert
Copy link
Collaborator

cvrebert commented Feb 6, 2014

👏 👏 👏

@zlatanvasovic zlatanvasovic deleted the license-object branch February 6, 2014 19:09
@mdo
Copy link
Member

mdo commented Feb 7, 2014

What about the docs license?

@cvrebert
Copy link
Collaborator

cvrebert commented Feb 7, 2014

I think generally only the code's license is mentioned in package.json?

@mdo
Copy link
Member

mdo commented Feb 7, 2014

Word, sounds good. <3

@mdo mdo mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2014
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants