* [COMMENT] - ShadowBan shoud be used to ban bad users, not to become a tool for online criminal militias silence opponents #1768
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is clearly a PROBLEM with this approach: ShadowBan is supposed to ban abusers from the platform, but with this code, it can be used by malicious groups and virtual militias to produce a coordinated ATTACK to silence someone they don't like. There are several reports of this on Twitter, people who defend human rights or produce anti-racist content are being attacked by Follow -> unfollow or block / mute attacks, producing the unbalance equation needed to shadowBan someone.
This is COMPLETELY AGAINST THE IDEA OF FREE SPEECH. A group of criminals or virtual militias can now SILENCE someone they don't like, and this ends up being perceived by the user because it is now possible to see the view statistics from someone's tweets and replies.
A lot of people are being unfairly silenced by malicious groups now, because that they have access to this code and now understands how it works and how to do it.