Relax requirements constraints #391
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
September 28, 2023 17:30
|
I strongly support this PR. I have done the same on my local branch managed with PDM. I did not have problems installing it and using it with the relaxed constraints, but YMMV. |
|
🤘 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which dependencies can be relaxed, if not all? As is, this great package is currently nearly impossible to use with any modern dependency software such as
poetryper this issue.Do these updated requirements look okay, or do they need to be further constrained? They seem to work fine for the tasks I am using from this package.