Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor correction to Object Array example, added Java Array example... #935

Conversation

GordonBGood
Copy link
Contributor

@GordonBGood GordonBGood commented Jan 22, 2019

Description

As per issues #929, the import line for the Object :Array example was corrected to hide the existing definition for JInteger so the example compiles without errors.

As well, as per issue #930 a similar example for the use of Java Arrays (JByteArray in this case) was added.

The expected output was added to both examples.

How Has This Been Tested?

Only changes the documentation, but the changed/added examples were tested with "etlas run" using etlas version 1.5.0.0 and eta version 0.8.6b4.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation change
  • Test suite change

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.

The line for the Object :Array example was corrected to hide the existing definition for JInteger so the example compiles without errors.

As well, a similar exampe for the use of Java Arrays (JByteArray in this case) was added.

Both examples state the expected output.
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 22, 2019

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Member

@rahulmutt rahulmutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GordonBGood Wonderful, thanks for fixing & adding outputs!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants