Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

try travis trusty beta with higher memory #1389

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2016

Conversation

kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

as suggested by @BennyHill in #1387

@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Sep 22, 2016

Sounds like it's worth a shot! 👍

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 22, 2016

Current coverage is 91.72% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1389 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #1389   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           238        238          
  Lines          3600       3600          
  Methods        3474       3535    +61   
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches        125         64    -61   
==========================================
  Hits           3302       3302          
  Misses          298        298          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 7f3b80c...25768dd

@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@adelbertc adelbertc merged commit ca290e1 into typelevel:master Sep 22, 2016
@stew stew removed the in progress label Sep 22, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 22, 2016

Just a quick note for future ref.

The build has 3 JVM forks, each of which fire up a new JVM with its own memory requirements. So we need to keep an eye out that these forks are not the cause of the OOM in envs like travis.ci that have limited resources. I'm not saying the forking is right/wrong, just "noting".

@kailuowang kailuowang deleted the try-trusty-travis branch September 22, 2016 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants