Added two links to the learner page #1697
Conversation
|
Already checked with @mpilquist. @BartoszMilewski please feel free to let us know if you have issues with us linking to your online lectures, thanks! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1697 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.93% 93.92% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 241 246 +5
Lines 4091 4260 +169
Branches 151 155 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 3843 4001 +158
- Misses 248 259 +11
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
| of lectures about basic functional structures. | ||
| * [Category Theory for Programmers](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbgaMIhjbmEnaH_LTkxLI7FMa2HsnawM_) | ||
| by [Bartosz Milewski](https://github.com/BartoszMilewski) is a wonder | ||
| serias of category theory lectures oriented towards programmers. The |
| by [Michael Pilquist](https://github.com/MPilquist) offers a series | ||
| of lectures about basic functional structures. | ||
| * [Category Theory for Programmers](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbgaMIhjbmEnaH_LTkxLI7FMa2HsnawM_) | ||
| by [Bartosz Milewski](https://github.com/BartoszMilewski) is a wonder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, 2 kind of nitpicky questions/comments.
What exactly do you mean by "wonder series"? Did you mean "wonderful series"? If so, "wonderful" is probably fine, but it might be better to use a more objective description.
I'm a bit hesitant to say "should be easy for non-Haskell programmers to follow". Even introductory category theory and haskell can be a big paradigm shift for people, and I don't want to discourage people or have them feel bad about themselves if they don't easily follow it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Those are really good points. Thanks @ceedubs!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for making the changes @kailuowang. This looks great to me.
No description provided.