Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NonEmptyTraverse docs #1787

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 11, 2017

Conversation

LukaJCB
Copy link
Member

@LukaJCB LukaJCB commented Aug 5, 2017

This should eventually resolve #1747. Still WIP however, looking for some feedback :)

@LukaJCB LukaJCB changed the title Add non empty traverse docs Add NonEmptyTraverse docs Aug 5, 2017
@LukaJCB LukaJCB force-pushed the add-non-empty-traverse-docs branch from 1fbbfb2 to 74f67c1 Compare August 5, 2017 22:09
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 5, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1787 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1787   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.57%   95.57%           
=======================================
  Files         248      248           
  Lines        4454     4454           
  Branches      126      111   -15     
=======================================
  Hits         4257     4257           
  Misses        197      197

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0e33b29...bfa0685. Read the comment docs.

@kailuowang
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, thanks! 👍

@kailuowang kailuowang modified the milestone: 1.0.0-RC1 Aug 8, 2017
@LukaJCB LukaJCB mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2017
70 tasks
@kailuowang kailuowang modified the milestone: 1.0.0-RC1 Aug 29, 2017

# NonEmptyTraverse`

`NonEmptyTraverse` is a non-empty version of the `Traverse` type class, just like `Reducible` is a non-empty version of `Foldable`.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we link to the Traverse documentation here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, fixed :)

Copy link
Contributor

@ceedubs ceedubs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @LukaJCB! One minor comment, but this is great!


# NonEmptyTraverse`

`NonEmptyTraverse` is a non-empty version of the [Traverse](traverse.html) type class, just like [Reducible](reducible.html) is a non-empty version of [Foldable](foldable.html)`.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that there's a dangling backtick on this line.

@peterneyens peterneyens merged commit aaecd08 into typelevel:master Oct 11, 2017
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.0.0-RC1 milestone Oct 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add NonEmptyTraverse tut documentation
5 participants