-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add NonEmptyTraverse docs #1787
Add NonEmptyTraverse docs #1787
Conversation
1fbbfb2
to
74f67c1
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1787 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.57% 95.57%
=======================================
Files 248 248
Lines 4454 4454
Branches 126 111 -15
=======================================
Hits 4257 4257
Misses 197 197 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
LGTM, thanks! 👍 |
|
||
# NonEmptyTraverse` | ||
|
||
`NonEmptyTraverse` is a non-empty version of the `Traverse` type class, just like `Reducible` is a non-empty version of `Foldable`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we link to the Traverse
documentation here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, fixed :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @LukaJCB! One minor comment, but this is great!
|
||
# NonEmptyTraverse` | ||
|
||
`NonEmptyTraverse` is a non-empty version of the [Traverse](traverse.html) type class, just like [Reducible](reducible.html) is a non-empty version of [Foldable](foldable.html)`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that there's a dangling backtick on this line.
This should eventually resolve #1747. Still WIP however, looking for some feedback :)