Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move followedBy/forEffect tests to ApplyTests #1963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2017

Conversation

peterneyens
Copy link
Collaborator

Move the followedBy and forEffect consistency tests from FlatMapTests to ApplyTests.

Small follow up on #1955.

@johnynek
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 11, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1963 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1963   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.07%   96.07%           
=======================================
  Files         273      273           
  Lines        4538     4538           
  Branches      117      122    +5     
=======================================
  Hits         4360     4360           
  Misses        178      178
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/FlatMapTests.scala 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
...c/main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/ApplyTests.scala 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update aaecd08...e6eccdc. Read the comment docs.

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit 523ac99 into typelevel:master Oct 11, 2017
@peterneyens peterneyens deleted the followedBy-lawtests branch October 11, 2017 13:00
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.0.0-RC1 milestone Oct 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants