-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add parTuple #2183
Add parTuple #2183
Conversation
This is awesome :-) could you maybe keep it as |
absolutely right, I will change it. Thanks |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2183 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 94.75% 94.75%
=======================================
Files 330 330
Lines 5568 5568
Branches 201 207 +6
=======================================
Hits 5276 5276
Misses 292 292
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
project/Boilerplate.scala
Outdated
| * @groupdesc ParTupleArity Higher-arity parTuple methods | ||
| * @groupprio ParTupleArity 999 | ||
| */ | ||
|trait ParallelArityFunctions2 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we make this one an abstract class then we can add more methods in the future without breaking bin compat.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure, changed. To avoid problems mixing in the two with Parallel I extended ParallelArityFunctions
with ParallelArityFunctions2
. Do you think this will prevent from adding methods in the future ? Thanks
It looks like there are some memory issues in the CI. Do I have ways to trigger it again ? I think it should pass, I checked MiMa locally and should be fine. |
Thanks very much for this @barambani! Just a tiny last request, can we add some sort of test for this? I'm pretty confident this works as is, but should we ever change anything it'd be good to have that extra test :) |
Thank you all |
Sorry I missed the edit. I will add the tests 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great, thanks much!
Thank you gents for the help 👍 |
As from the discussion in here #2128 this and attempt to add parTuple syntax in a way that preserves backwards binary compatibility.