Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 2608 - Ambiguous implicit values for Functor[Kleisli[F, A, ?]] #2618

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2018
Merged

Issue 2608 - Ambiguous implicit values for Functor[Kleisli[F, A, ?]] #2618

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2018

Conversation

barambani
Copy link
Contributor

This should fix #2608 . @kailuowang I tried this other way to disambiguate the instance priority as Mima check passes on all the Scala versions (+mimaReportBinaryIssues) so I assume the BC is ok.
I'm happy to change it though, and do as you suggest if you think there will be problems.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 17, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2618 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2618   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.17%   95.17%           
=======================================
  Files         363      363           
  Lines        6693     6693           
  Branches      307      291   -16     
=======================================
  Hits         6370     6370           
  Misses        323      323
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
core/src/main/scala/cats/data/Kleisli.scala 97.14% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 533cc16...bbf7ac3. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@kailuowang kailuowang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great. Looks like mima was able to tell that these are sealed classes.

@barambani
Copy link
Contributor Author

👍

@LukaJCB LukaJCB merged commit f2060c3 into typelevel:master Nov 18, 2018
@LukaJCB
Copy link
Member

LukaJCB commented Nov 18, 2018

Thanks so much :)

@barambani barambani deleted the issue-2608 branch November 18, 2018 18:22
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 1.5.0-RC1 milestone Nov 19, 2018
@kailuowang kailuowang added the bug label Nov 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ambiguous implicit values for Functor[Kleisli[F, A, ?]]
4 participants