Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sbt-sonatype to 3.9.1 #3370

Conversation

scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

Updates org.xerial.sbt:sbt-sonatype from 3.8.1 to 3.9.1.
GitHub Release Notes - Release Notes - Version Diff

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.xerial.sbt", artifactId = "sbt-sonatype" } ]

labels: sbt-plugin-update, semver-minor

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3370 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3370   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.33%   93.33%           
=======================================
  Files         378      378           
  Lines        7723     7723           
  Branches      218      218           
=======================================
  Hits         7208     7208           
  Misses        515      515
Flag Coverage Δ
#scala_version_212 93.38% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#scala_version_213 93.11% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c494157...8104bb4. Read the comment docs.

@rossabaker
Copy link
Member

Superseded by #3371.

@rossabaker rossabaker closed this Mar 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants