Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove traverseForEither in Traverse companion object #3540

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2020

Conversation

LukaJCB
Copy link
Member

@LukaJCB LukaJCB commented Jul 29, 2020

I'm not quite sure how this got here, but it's messing up things in dotty 0.25 so we should get rid of it asap.

@LukaJCB LukaJCB added this to the 2.2.0 milestone Jul 29, 2020
@LukaJCB
Copy link
Member Author

LukaJCB commented Jul 29, 2020

Seems like this was introduced here: 56d94da#diff-dfc66c84b778099ad28a81e9b0ece505

@travisbrown I'm assuming this was a mistake, but maybe there was some motivation I'm unaware of?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3540 into master will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3540      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.34%   91.33%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         386      386              
  Lines        8592     8591       -1     
  Branches      269      251      -18     
==========================================
- Hits         7848     7847       -1     
  Misses        744      744              

@LukaJCB LukaJCB mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2020
@barambani
Copy link
Contributor

I guess it's pretty safe to merge this in.

@larsrh larsrh merged commit 3b819ce into master Aug 8, 2020
@larsrh larsrh deleted the remove-traverse branch August 8, 2020 18:31
@travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm, just saw this PR, but yes, looks like a mistake to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants