Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new shapes to Unapply #568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2015
Merged

Add new shapes to Unapply #568

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2015

Conversation

stew
Copy link
Contributor

@stew stew commented Oct 15, 2015

This commit adds Unapply shapes which will match a datum with a type in the
shape F[X[_], Y] with a typeclass expecting a F[_]

Thanks to @smungee who noticed that apply syntax was not working with
FreeApplicative because of this.

This commit adds Unapply shapes which will match a datum with a type in the
shape F[X[_], Y] with a typeclass expecting a F[_]

Thanks to @smungee who noticed that apply syntax was not working with
FreeApplicative because of this.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 75.68%

Merging #568 into master will decrease coverage by -0.05% as of 41f264c

@@            master    #568   diff @@
======================================
  Files          157     157       
  Stmts         2155    2159     +4
  Branches        68      68       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit           1632    1634     +2
  Partial          0       0       
- Missed         523     525     +2

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 41f264c

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Oct 15, 2015

👍

non added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015
@non non merged commit 757ff73 into typelevel:master Oct 15, 2015
@non non removed the in progress label Oct 15, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants