Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify stabilty guarantees; drop 'proof of concept' and 'experimental'. #964

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 2, 2016

Conversation

milessabin
Copy link
Member

No description provided.


<div class="msg warn"> <p><strong> Cats is a new project under active
development</strong>. Feedback and contributions are welcomed as we look
to improve the it. This project is evolving quickly and we are making no
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo "the it"

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 90.97%

Merging #964 into master will not affect coverage as of 4455c3a

@@            master    #964   diff @@
======================================
  Files          180     180       
  Stmts         2150    2150       
  Branches        42      42       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit           1956    1956       
  Partial          0       0       
  Missed         194     194       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 4455c3a

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@mikejcurry
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM - explicit targets are good!

contributions are welcomed as we look to improve the project. This
project is evolving quickly and we currently make no guarantees about what
might drastically change in the near future.</p> </div>
Cats is a library intended to provide abstractions for functional
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it "intend to " or does it achieve it? ie:

Cats is a library that provides abstractions for functional.....

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's better.

@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented Apr 2, 2016

👍

1 similar comment
@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@adelbertc adelbertc merged commit 7e49a85 into typelevel:master Apr 2, 2016
@stew stew removed the in progress label Apr 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants