Cut out a bunch of Travis builds to see if things are better. #503
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's possible this is too aggressive (or not aggressive enough) but I wanted to see how much faster and more reliable things would be with these settings.
|
Well, things are still super flaky (and it takes awhile to get scheduled). On the up-side, we only had 14 jobs and the longest took only 8 minutes, which is an improvement. |
|
@ashawley What do you think? It might be nice to do something like this (at least until Travis gets less flaky). For the last couple days I think we've all had to baby-sit these Travis builds and click restart on the failed jobs which is annoying. |
ashawley
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2019
|
Yeah, makes sense. Looks like it cuts the build times in half. |
|
I don't know the history of and if that doesn't make sense, then I wonder if it might make sense to eliminate |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's possible this is too aggressive (or not aggressive enough) but I
wanted to see how much faster and more reliable things would be with
these settings.