You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Default constructors of BigInt (and BigDecimal) from the string representation have O(n^2) complexity, while for power of 2 bases (like 16) and for others (like 10) corresponding complexities can be archived: O(n) and O(n^1.5).
Default constructors of
BigInt
(andBigDecimal
) from the string representation have O(n^2) complexity, while for power of 2 bases (like 16) and for others (like 10) corresponding complexities can be archived: O(n) and O(n^1.5).Does spire have more efficient constructors from string representations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: