sbt-scoverage 1.6.1 and scala 2.13: solving incompatibility issue

[denisrosset]

No description provided.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #855 into master will increase coverage by 4.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #855      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   48.72%   52.74%   +4.02%     
==========================================
  Files         212      195      -17     
  Lines       12841    11917     -924     
  Branches     1090     1038      -52     
==========================================
+ Hits         6257     6286      +29     
+ Misses       6584     5631     -953

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ala/spire/math/poly/BigDecimalRootRefinement.scala	85.43% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
...in/scala/spire/benchmark/ArrayOrderBenchmark.scala
...k/src/main/scala/spire/benchmark/SizedArrays.scala
...ain/scala/spire/benchmark/StrictEqBenchmarks.scala
...rc/main/scala/spire/benchmark/BigIntRational.scala
...ain/scala/spire/benchmark/RationalBenchmarks.scala
...main/scala/spire/benchmark/FpFilterBenchmark.scala
...src/main/scala/spire/benchmark/SubBenchmarks.scala
...src/main/scala/spire/benchmark/CForBenchmark.scala
...ain/scala/spire/benchmark/SafeLongBenchmarks.scala
... and 12 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ccf886c...b10a14d. Read the comment docs.