Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-deprecated] support computed member access #10867

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

azat-io
Copy link
Contributor

@azat-io azat-io commented Feb 22, 2025

PR Checklist

Overview

The rule now correctly detects deprecated properties when they are accessed using computed member expressions (obj['prop']), variables (const x = 'prop'; obj[x]).

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @azat-io!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 22, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3507f62
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6821d8bea0011300087e47e9
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10867--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 87 (🔴 down 12 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 22, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 3507f62.

Command Status Duration Result
nx run eslint-plugin:test -- --coverage ✅ Succeeded 6m 24s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin ✅ Succeeded 6m 2s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded 1s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 5m 1s View ↗
nx typecheck ast-spec ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --exclude website --... ✅ Succeeded 6s View ↗
nx test utils ✅ Succeeded 3s View ↗
Additional runs (26) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-05-12 11:29:33 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.92%. Comparing base (a89d5e3) to head (3507f62).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #10867   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.91%   90.92%           
=======================================
  Files         499      499           
  Lines       50808    50841   +33     
  Branches     8369     8380   +11     
=======================================
+ Hits        46194    46227   +33     
  Misses       4599     4599           
  Partials       15       15           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 90.92% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-deprecated.ts 96.96% <100.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@azat-io azat-io force-pushed the fix/no-deprecated-objects branch from ca1fc1f to c715c75 Compare February 24, 2025 20:41
@azat-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

azat-io commented Feb 24, 2025

Rebased.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for getting this started! Codecov is surfacing that several logical branches aren't covered by tests - could you please test them?

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Mar 2, 2025
@azat-io azat-io force-pushed the fix/no-deprecated-objects branch 2 times, most recently from febc81f to 2bc22e8 Compare March 2, 2025 12:27
@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

👋 Just checking in @azat-io, do you still have time for this?

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the stale PRs or Issues that are at risk of being or have been closed due to inactivity for a prolonged period label Apr 7, 2025
@azat-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

azat-io commented Apr 8, 2025

Yes, sorry for the delay, I'll be back at the end of the week.

@azat-io azat-io force-pushed the fix/no-deprecated-objects branch 4 times, most recently from 05a7916 to f19bc3f Compare April 20, 2025 15:28
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg removed the stale PRs or Issues that are at risk of being or have been closed due to inactivity for a prolonged period label Apr 21, 2025
@azat-io
Copy link
Contributor Author

azat-io commented May 5, 2025

Any feedback?

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

JoshuaKGoldberg commented May 5, 2025

Oh I didn't realize this was ready for re-review! We normally wait until the actual Re-Request Review button is pressed. But great, looking now!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg self-requested a review May 5, 2025 15:45
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label May 5, 2025
JoshuaKGoldberg
JoshuaKGoldberg previously approved these changes May 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Just a couple of small notes, nothing we can't apply before merging. Only the removal of isStringLiteral() is something I think we really need.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label May 5, 2025
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 523b3ea into typescript-eslint:main May 12, 2025
56 of 57 checks passed
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.31.0 | 8.32.1 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.31.0 | 8.32.1 |


## [v8.32.1](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8321-2025-05-12)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] check for indirect circular types in aliased mapped types ([#11177](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11177))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] adjust auto-fixer to generate valid syntax for `TSMappedType` with no type annotation ([#11180](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11180))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] support computed member access ([#10867](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10867))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-conversion] shouldn't have fixable property ([#11194](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11194))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Azat S. [@azat-io](https://github.com/azat-io)
-   Dima Barabash [@dbarabashh](https://github.com/dbarabashh)
-   Ronen Amiel

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.


## [v8.32.0](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8320-2025-05-05)

##### 🚀 Features

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[only-throw-error] add option `allowRethrowing` ([#11075](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11075))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-conversion] add rule ([#10182](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10182))

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-nullish-coalescing] fix parenthesization bug in suggestion ([#11098](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11098))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[unified-signatures] exempt `this` from optional parameter overload check ([#11005](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11005))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-parameters] should parenthesize type in suggestion fixer if necessary ([#10907](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10907))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Andy Edwards
-   Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)
-   mdm317
-   Sasha Kondrashov
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.


## [v8.31.1](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8311-2025-04-28)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] downgrade fix to suggestion ([#11081](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#11081))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Kirk Waiblinger [@kirkwaiblinger](https://github.com/kirkwaiblinger)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-deprecated] doesn't report deprecated type index access
2 participants