Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Test against go 1.22 #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JacobOaks
Copy link
Contributor

Upgrades CI workflows to use Go versions 1.21 and 1.22.

Leave go.mod the same to avoid forcing upgrade beyond 1.20 for users.

@JacobOaks JacobOaks mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2024
JacobOaks added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
This PR upgrades CI actions to their latest versions.

At the very least, the codecov action is necessary because otherwise PRs
stall on codecov upload step (example:
#81)
Upgrades CI workflows to use Go versions 1.21 and 1.22.

Leave `go.mod` the same to avoid forcing upgrade beyond 1.20 for users.
@JacobOaks JacobOaks marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2024 17:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (a22d13d) to head (9f9f99d).

❗ Current head 9f9f99d differs from pull request most recent head cf6a15c. Consider uploading reports for the commit cf6a15c to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #81   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          132       108   -24     
=========================================
- Hits           132       108   -24     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JacobOaks JacobOaks merged commit cf4b232 into uber-go:master Apr 29, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants