Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix another JSpecify mode crash involving raw types #1086

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

msridhar
Copy link
Collaborator

@msridhar msridhar commented Dec 9, 2024

Fixes the second crash of #1082. Weird things can happen with raw types...see the test case.

@msridhar msridhar requested a review from lazaroclapp December 9, 2024 02:22
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.96%. Comparing base (d21d4ab) to head (a8b94dd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1086      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     87.93%   87.96%   +0.02%     
- Complexity     2221     2222       +1     
============================================
  Files            85       85              
  Lines          7197     7197              
  Branches       1427     1427              
============================================
+ Hits           6329     6331       +2     
+ Misses          438      437       -1     
+ Partials        430      429       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@msridhar msridhar enabled auto-merge (squash) December 12, 2024 20:25
@msridhar msridhar merged commit 933b1af into master Dec 12, 2024
11 checks passed
@msridhar msridhar deleted the issue-1082-jspecify branch December 12, 2024 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants