-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
changed the formats file to read comma separated z file #263
Conversation
No issue from me with changing it, I'll leave it to the gm hazard group |
Based on the file we saw this morning, non_uniform.z, this change does make sense |
Oh, actually I just realised changing this way will mean that Joel's stuff won't work. 🤔 |
We should decide on one format (comma separated imo), and any files not of that format should just be converted (should be pretty straightforward?) |
Yeah, agreed. Do you mean one format for all station files? Or one format for Z specifically? Historically, station files were tab delimited and workflow depends on them being so. But Z is currently only used in gm_hazard - with potential to be used in standard empirical calculations. Either way, I think chatting about this on Monday would probably be best. |
@jasonmotha We forgot to chat regarding the above today. |
@claudio525 Might be a good idea to chat about it tomorrow. Basically, I doubt we'd ever get to the point of updating station/vs30 files as they are used in EMOD3D. Just had a quick look at project.py and I'll have to do a quick change there too. |
I've checked this file and it looks like that the only place that this function was called was empirical db in seistech.
The proposed format going forward is keeping the comma delimited file (outputted from the VM code). - this is different to the tab/space delimited station and vs30 file.
Thoughts / changes?