Higher-order beta-matching #220
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mrhaandi
force-pushed
the
HO-matching
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9e8f99c
to
f0fe3f5
Compare
added reduction from SSTS01 to HOMbeta
yforster
approved these changes
Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HOMbetaSSTS01toHOMbetaresulting inundecidable HOMbetaThe reduction is quite different from the known technique by Loader [1].
It is based on the technique used for intersection type inhabitation, see
IntersectionTypes/Reductions/SSTS01_to_CD_INH.v, sharing a common seed. A write up for a potential publication is in progress.[1] Loader, Ralph. "Higher order β-matching is undecidable." Logic Journal of the IGPL 11.1 (2003): 51-68.