Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Enhancement proposals on decentralize branch #522

Closed
wants to merge 14 commits into from

Conversation

sarkarchandan
Copy link
Contributor

Premise: With this PR we would like to make some enhancement proposals on top of the changes in the decentralize branch. The details of the proposed enhancement would be entered gradually and finalized post discussion.

sarkarchandan and others added 6 commits August 1, 2023 09:10
From scipy=1.10.0 onward pooch package has been included as the optional dependency for the datasets module. Upon importing datasets module there's supposed to be no error. However, calling module function will raise an ImportError if pooch is missing from the environment. Ref: scipy/scipy#16854. This is need for tests/util/focous.py which is used in TestProcesses.
Coverage upload issue concerning codecov is fixed in master
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (decentralize@22f9c2f). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             decentralize     #522   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   78.88%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      126           
  Lines                   ?     9371           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     7392           
  Misses                  ?     1979           
  Partials                ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sarkarchandan
Copy link
Contributor Author

It does not make sense to refactor the api-layer without being familiar with the big picture of the implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants