Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clean up additional deprecated control dependencies #1525

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

clean up additional deprecated control dependencies #1525

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2022

Conversation

jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 commented Dec 7, 2022

PR Checklist

  • This PR is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR. Please consult the ufs-weather-model wiki if you are unsure how to do this.

  • This PR has been tested using a branch which is up-to-date with the top of all sub-component repositories except for those sub-components which are the subject of this PR

  • An Issue describing the work contained in this PR has been created either in the subcomponent(s) or in the ufs-weather-model. The Issue should be created in the repository that is most relevant to the changes in contained in the PR. The Issue and the dependent sub-component PR
    are specified below.

  • Results for one or more of the regression tests change and the reasons for the changes are understood and explained below.

  • New or updated input data is required by this PR. If checked, please work with the code managers to update input data sets on all platforms.

Instructions: All subsequent sections of text should be filled in as appropriate.

The information provided below allows the code managers to understand the changes relevant to this PR, whether those changes are in the ufs-weather-model repository or in a subcomponent repository. Ufs-weather-model code managers will use the information provided to add any applicable labels, assign reviewers and place it in the Commit Queue. Once the PR is in the Commit Queue, it is the PR owner's responsibility to keep the PR up-to-date with the develop branch of ufs-weather-model.

Description

Provide a detailed description of what this PR does. What bug does it fix, or what feature does it add? Is a change of answers expected from this PR? Are any library updates included in this PR (modulefiles etc.)?

Issue(s) addressed

Link the issues to be closed with this PR, whether in this repository, or in another repository.
(Remember, issues must always be created before starting work on a PR branch!)

Testing

How were these changes tested? What compilers / HPCs was it tested with? Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?) Have regression tests and unit tests (utests) been run? On which platforms and with which compilers? (Note that unit tests can only be run on tier-1 platforms)

  • hera.intel
  • hera.gnu
  • orion.intel
  • cheyenne.intel
  • cheyenne.gnu
  • gaea.intel
  • jet.intel
  • wcoss2.intel
  • acorn.intel
  • opnReqTest for newly added/changed feature
  • CI

Dependencies

If testing this branch requires non-default branches in other repositories, list them. Those branches should have matching names (ideally).

Do PRs in upstream repositories need to be merged first?
If so add the "waiting for other repos" label and list the upstream PRs

  • waiting on noaa-emc/nems/pull/<pr_number>
  • waiting on noaa-emc/fv3atm/pull/<pr_number>

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jkbk2004 commented Dec 8, 2022

Copy link
Collaborator

@BrianCurtis-NOAA BrianCurtis-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jkbk2004 confirmed he tested rt with -c and -m. Approved

@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 merged commit 7e98ecf into ufs-community:develop Dec 8, 2022
@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@jkbk2004 I'd suggest changing these three tests to control_p8 based tests. Since these tests were removed, please add three corresponding tests based on control_p8 to maintain the capabilities. Thanks

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jkbk2004 commented Dec 8, 2022

@jkbk2004 I'd suggest changing these three tests to control_p8 based tests. Since these tests were removed, please add three corresponding tests based on control_p8 to maintain the capabilities. Thanks

Sure!

@SamuelTrahanNOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

There are a lot of important "safeguard" tests that were removed along with the "control" test. Any variants that "control" or "control_debug" had, the "control_p8" should have too.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

DeniseWorthen commented Dec 8, 2022

@junwang-noaa

Don't we have control_p8 versions already?

RUN     | control_p8                                                                                                              |                                         | fv3 |
RUN     | control_p8_lndp                                                                                                         |                                         | fv3 |
RUN     | control_restart_p8                                                                                                      |                                         |     | control_p8
RUN     | control_decomp_p8                                                                                                       |                                         |     |
RUN     | control_2threads_p8                   

and also for control_debug_p8?

EDIT: I just re-read what you wrote; I had misunderstood so you can disregard this comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

three tests fail due to missing control & control_debug
6 participants